what's the required %...

On December 14 2005 17:31 Rekrul wrote: in order to be getting 'your money in' with the best hand 85% of the time you need to be folding 99% of the time and you do neither of those so you're just a fucking idiot

i don't mean pre flops. I mean at the moment when i put my money into the pot, say after the flop or at the turn. if flops comes something like K24, and i have AK. i put my money all, smeone with K10 calls. this is what i mean.

we understand what you mean

abrasive... 1 word: disciprine. disciprine my friend.

Well stop putting money in the pot preflop when you're behind too, then.

Don't know where you pulled that 85% from, but I have a pretty good idea... And if this infact is true, after 2 years, the only reasonable explanation is that in the 15% you go in when you're behind, you put in MORE money than that 85% you put money in when you're ahead.

The fact that you aren't winning yet should be considered a sign of either lack of talent or lack of dedication. Plus the "advice" you've been giving in other threads have been abismal at least. One that comes to mind was that "if you're running cold, you know you're not going to win anything that night anyway"- post which makes it pretty clear that you have yet to master the very basic ideas of the game.

Cheers.

If you really get your money in with the best hand that much of the time a) you have the worst luck in the world b) You REALLY REALLY pay people off when you dont have the best hand.

What do you define as "the best hand"

presumably its anything from 51% favourite up. Maybe youre just getting into coin-flips all the time.

i do not believe you are winner at nl100
you are retarded and you will never understand why

On December 15 2005 02:37 byrnesam wrote: What do you define as "the best hand" presumably its anything from 51% favourite up. Maybe youre just getting into coin-flips all the time.

Or making bad calls when he's outdrawn.

No wonder these guys blew at brood wars. Look at how they think.

Abrasive, you're looking at an unsubstantiated and totally useless piece of stand-alone data. "85%+" <--- LOL

What type of games ure talking about ?

Yea that's what I meant when I said I have pretty good idea where he pulled the 85% from... Post your stats from pokertracker (if you don't have it, after 2 years, you should get it). They tell awful lot.

u guys need to realize he's trolling

he's been doing this kind of shit from 5 years back in Clan x17

People here want to consider he's not. There's always the "what if?" ;D

no, people here hope hes not

so the newbies have hope they can be professional poker players with people like that out there

he's a pretty damn convincing troll

honestly to answer the question, just to beat the rake its quite a bit.. im averaging 15BB/100hands on the 10cent tables, which is vry good for me since i started w/pokertracker, but for the last $150 ive won the total rake has been $60, so to even beat the rake you have to be at least around 3BB/100hands ?

i dont really know if hes trolling or not? seems lke an honest question from some1 whos' frustrated

why still accusing me of trolling? it's a honest question I really want to know the answer to it...

On December 15 2005 06:12 Rekrul wrote: u guys need to realize he's trolling he's been doing this kind of shit from 5 years back in Clan x17

wait my math was wrong? you need at least to win at least 5BB/100hands to beat the rake at .05/.10, which is pretty insane
im hoping to move up limits next few days where the rake is less %