1
| |
Hey guys,
I have gotten to play heads-up against a couple somewhat strong players recently, so I want to purchase a program to help get stats and analyze hands. I used an old version poker tracker a while back, and thought it was fairly good. Is there something better that you guys would suggest? I will probably move to studying PLO in a few months, so perhaps something that is helpful PLO would be desirable as well. What program would you suggest picking up now?
As always, thanks for the advice
~N
|
|
|
1
|
SPEWTARD   Peru. Jan 23 2015 16:12. Posts 4306 | | |
i ve used HEM and PT and i can say PT is better |
|
|
|
1
|
devon06atX   Canada. Jan 23 2015 17:24. Posts 5459 | | |
i ve used PT and HEM and i can say HEM is better |
|
|
1
|
NewbSaibot   United States. Jan 23 2015 17:48. Posts 4946 | | |
I've only used HEM and say HEM is better (I'm good at first impressions) |
|
|
|
1
|
Fujikura   United States. Jan 23 2015 18:06. Posts 1795 | | |
Try the trials on both, see what you like better and use it. I prefer HM fwiw. |
|
aka SouL)Z(Isadie and SouL)P(Fujikura | |
|
|
5
|
Garfed   Malta. Jan 24 2015 10:42. Posts 4818 | | |
I used them all and I think
HEM > PT3
PT4 > HEM 2
By the way, both products are owned by the same company. Also, I sent you a PM, check it |
|
|
1
|
flounder44   United States. Jan 25 2015 16:53. Posts 916 | | |
|
|
1
|
Bobosaur   Canada. Jan 26 2015 06:31. Posts 30 | | |
using hem2, and it is not pleasant to use if your computer blows like mine. |
|
|
1
|
VanDerMeyde   Norway. Jan 26 2015 07:37. Posts 5113 | | |
|
|
|
|