|
|
 |
Bye profits |
 |
1 | |
Couldn't last very long. Back to NL5 grinding until I get over $200 again.
Probably my own fault as well, due to hands like this -> http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/248783 or http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/248800 . Dunno, might be questioning my play too much due to meeting a lot of sets in these type of circumstances. Most costly hand would be http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/248774 . Shouldn't I have slowplayed there? I figured there weren't many hands that beat me there, nor were there many draws (K97 rainbow? Perhaps a gutshot.)
|
|
| | Last edit: 11/08/2007 07:52 |
|
| 4
 |
TianYuan  Korea (South). Aug 11 2007 08:07. Posts 6817 | | |
Huh? It says you lost 3$ at NL10, how much money do you have right now :X? |
| |
|
| 1
 |
qwerty67890 New Zealand. Aug 11 2007 08:41. Posts 14026 | | |
at NL10 dont bother slow playing anything but flopped fullhouse, quads or better.
also lol @ negative sklansky bucks |
|
| 1
|
qwerty67890 New Zealand. Aug 11 2007 09:03. Posts 14026 | | |
| | I've been running pretty decent at NL5 and NL10 recently, playing ultra nitty in NL5 FR and taking stabs at NL10 6max playing LAG |
stick to 6 max or FR for both NL10 and NL5 that way theres less adjustments to make when you move up.
6 max is more aggressive and generally the players are better. If youre winning at FR but losing at 6 max just keep playing FR and build your roll - youll continue to learn then the transition to 6max will be easier later on. |
|
| |
|
|
 Poker Streams | |
|
Contact Users: 1646 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 06:04
