|
|
 |
NL10 no good |
 |
1 | |
So I've been pretty much crushing NL2 in the past week and had myself up to a little under $200, so I decided I'd take a shot at NL10. Decided to skip 5 because I didn't feel like it added anything last time I was moving through stakes. Anyway, NL10 is an entirely different ballgame from the robot-like 16-tabling that is NL2.
I feel like I'm playing pretty well, but being down 7BIs doesn't really show it. I definitely think NL10 can be real profitable, especially since more than half of my losses have come in huge hands. Examples:
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326818
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326820
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326825 - Note, I don't like the way I played this hand, but this guy turned out to be a real bad player anyway, so I'll put it in this group. I put him on AXcc or a smaller pair like 77-99. It was a bad check on the turn, though.
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326822
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326826
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326827
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326829
This guy has a bunch of my money too. He's one of the regulars who is there multi-tabling with me, so I've been trying to treat him like a real player who's capable of realizing my betting patterns and raising my c-bets with air. So far that hasn't been the case:
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326821
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326823
I've also made my share of bad plays, so I don't want to shed all of the blame:
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326819 - I've been just 4-bet shoving in situations like this when I have QQ-AA or AK, but I'm not sure if that's the best play. At the very least I don't think QQ should be a shove in this situation, even though I'm OOP. Thoughts?
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/326824 - I'm a bad player. I don't think there's a hand that flats the flop, open-shoves the turn that I'm ahead of.
There's a few more like that, but its the same basic ideas - bad shoves or over-valuing TPTK.
So I've dropped back down to NL2 and continue to run at 20+ PTBB/100. It's like candy from a baby. Except its money. I think I'm just going to spend all of December 16-tabling NL2, or playing until I have 20+ buy-ins for NL10. Hopefully it won't be that long.
|
|
| ChipsOrGTFO ||| NeillyJQ: i need atleast 2 buy-ins, duh. | |
|
| 1
 |
warsumm United States. Dec 02 2007 09:25. Posts 591 | | |
eh, mainly just bad beats man, nothing too much wrong with your play. if you count up all the bad beats, theres maybe 100-120 dollar turnaround, and a couple of bad plays is another 40. play is fine imo and just keep pluggin away |
|
| 1 | |
Yeah, it started out as a whine post, but as I went through there were more beats than I thought and it became more of a "I can beat this, just not right now" post. Gonna build back to $200 and move back up. Don't really feel comfortable playing with 11 buy-ins. |
|
| ChipsOrGTFO ||| NeillyJQ: i need atleast 2 buy-ins, duh. | |
|
| 1
 |
Silver_nz New Zealand. Dec 02 2007 11:11. Posts 5647 | | | |
|
| |
|
|
 Poker Streams | |
|
Contact Users: 742 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 16:51
