1
 |
Python817 Canada. Dec 19 2007 22:39. Posts 2733 | | | |
|
| | Last edit: 30/01/2008 17:15 |
|
|
1
|
rgfdxm United States. Dec 19 2007 22:45. Posts 1514 | | |
Personally I think the 70FPP sats all suck. I played a few and then decided I was better off saving up my FPPs. NL10 gives you FPPs really slowly too, although I suppose compared to NL2 it's pretty fast. If you're planning on moving up in stakes as soon as possible then I would just not worry about FPPs for a while yet. |
|
|
1
|
Python817 Canada. Dec 19 2007 22:51. Posts 2733 | | |
I plan on moving up asap so I think playing these sats once in a while for the extra $11 will help with that. |
|
|
1
|
rgfdxm United States. Dec 19 2007 22:56. Posts 1514 | | |
I expect you could easily make a higher hourly rate at NL10 tables than the sats, unless you're waaaaay better at SNG play than cash. The stakes are just too low to be worth spending your time IMO. If you want to do them for fun or as a change of pace then by all means, but if your aim is solely to make money I think there are better spots. |
|
| | Last edit: 19/12/2007 23:08 |
|
|
1
 |
PplusAD Germany. Dec 20 2007 03:58. Posts 7180 | | |
13 buy ins in 2,2 K hands ? ( from -6 to + 7 ) 
|
|
| U see what i did there with A8 ? He 4 bets and there we go insta jam A8 : ---booooom -- . hahahaha ( Krantz) | |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 711 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 10:44
