this hand needs a lot of lovin

GAME #1038798250: Texas Hold'em NL $0.02/$0.04 2008-06-23 02:38:34
Table "TURBO" Ipota
Seat 1: snowgirl23 ($19.07 in chips)
Seat 3: nofx21 ($7.26 in chips) DEALER
Seat 5: DanyLH2 ($23.49 in chips)
Seat 8: sirkurt ($11.47 in chips)
DanyLH2 : Post SB $0.02
snowgirl23: Post BB $0.04

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to DanyLH2
sirkurt: Sitout
nofx21: Fold
DanyLH2 : Raise (NF) $0.16
snowgirl23: Raise (NF) $0.80
DanyLH2 : Call $0.64

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $0.70)

   
DanyLH2 : Bet $1.60
snowgirl23: Raise (NF) $4.00
DanyLH2 : Call $2.40

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $4.70)

   
DanyLH2 : Check
snowgirl23: Bet $14.27
DanyLH2 : Call $14.27

River (Pot : $33.24)

   
Dealt to snowgirl23

Summary
Total pot $37.14 Rake $1.00
DanyLH2 : wins $37.14

0 votes

4bi deep btw at ipoker

aww baby microstakes

you guys are so adorable

On June 23 2008 02:45 vegable wrote: aww baby microstakes you guys are so adorable

Still a pretty good call, most of the time calls like this are a disaster.

I hate it pre. If you think villain 3bets out of frustration to 5x that doesn't mean he can't flop anything or do this with a retarded small PP or sg, and hero is OOP, so cold calling it pre and going broke blindly is a disastrous thing to try and do when villain plays NL4 and there is no way to ensure his betting pattern is any meaningful. You can justify the play with thoughtprocesses if you feel like it, or you can see villain showing sg like 33 and taking down the hand. Plays like this are best reserved for stakes when you can put more trust in your reads 400 BB deep...

you both played it like retards, period