1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Aug 03 2008 03:51. Posts 2591 | | |
Here is my lifetime graph in big blinds at Stars:
You can tell where I was in the Army just burning money with some friends in my unit because we didn't give two shits.
You can also pretty easily tell where I got out of the Army, and then had to learn how to adapt and actually play if I was going to continue, as burning money had lost it's touch.
Also, those first 20-50k hands, I didn't multi table. I doubt I even knew what the term meant.
I do remember oh so clearly the very first day and first 3 hands I went over in PokerTracker though...
"Wow. What the FUCK am I doing?!"
ya, that was me
Tho this may look like a lot of hands, in all I've played a lot more than this in the past two years. After I found out what rakeback was I ended up playing a lot on other sites that offered it. I'd only play PokerStars in waves, usually just for fun or mainly for something different.
But as my choices have gotten smaller depositing/withdrawing, and trust issues, good software and customer service become more and more important, I only really play live or at Stars anymore. Right now the only place to play online in my book.
take care and gl all!
random pic:
|
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Aug 03 2008 03:58. Posts 2591 | | |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
1
|
jase   Australia. Aug 03 2008 04:34. Posts 1604 | | |
WTF at the first 20k hands, well done gaining some discipline and learning to play |
|
| Last edit: 03/08/2008 04:35 |
|
|
1
|
Exhilarate   United States. Aug 03 2008 04:37. Posts 5453 | | |
first 20k hands is lol, damn.
i like stars too.
whats your bankroll btw? |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Aug 03 2008 04:43. Posts 2591 | | |
| On August 03 2008 03:34 MadeInPolanD wrote:
display all in EV plz |
sure, if u'll tell me what it means |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
| |
| On August 03 2008 03:43 tloapc wrote:
sure, if u'll tell me what it means
|
upper left corner of graph ( graphing options):
(*) Display All-In EV |
|
Make it rain$$$ | Last edit: 03/08/2008 04:45 |
|
|
1
|
gawdawaful   Canada. Aug 03 2008 04:45. Posts 9012 | | |
and how much is that in dollars |
|
Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
|
gawdawaful   Canada. Aug 03 2008 04:46. Posts 9012 | | |
btw it looks like a Nike swoosh |
|
Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Aug 03 2008 04:47. Posts 2591 | | |
| On August 03 2008 03:37 Exhilarate wrote:
first 20k hands is lol, damn.
i like stars too.
whats your bankroll btw? |
I don't have much on stars at the moment right now with the whole moving situations I'm in
I have about $1600 on stars at the moment, but in about a week I'm going to take all but 500 out for deposits, new bed, desk, chair etcetcetc
|
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Aug 03 2008 04:48. Posts 2591 | | |
| On August 03 2008 03:44 MadeInPolanD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 03 2008 03:43 tloapc wrote:
| On August 03 2008 03:34 MadeInPolanD wrote:
display all in EV plz |
sure, if u'll tell me what it means
|
upper left corner of graph ( graphing options):
(*) Display All-In EV |
I know how to do it, just dunno what it means tbh |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Aug 03 2008 04:49. Posts 2591 | | |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Aug 03 2008 04:52. Posts 2591 | | |
| On August 03 2008 03:45 gawdawaful wrote:
and how much is that in dollars |
about 5k in the green |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
| |
i think it 'should' show if you run hot or not in all-in's ( wining all in/times you should win all in based on % when you got all in ), but now as i can see either you run hot for 400k hands or it means shit - which sounds more possible to you? |
|
Make it rain$$$ | Last edit: 03/08/2008 05:06 |
|
|
1
|
Shabbzoy   United Kingdom. Aug 03 2008 05:02. Posts 841 | | |
it 'should' mean that you only just got breakeven on stars in if all your allins were converted into the actual equity you had at the time the betting closed |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Aug 03 2008 05:07. Posts 2591 | | |
hmm so I should say I run goot?
funny, I feel as tho my good hands always get cracked |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
gawdawaful   Canada. Aug 03 2008 05:09. Posts 9012 | | |
you guys do realize that means shit all right? As in you push a combo draw/semi bluff where you're expecting villain to fold a certain percent of time, and those % of time that they fold justifies the -EV you take when they do call (and only when they call is the equity calculated towards that graph)
I think in terms of equity on all ins, the only one that really measures anything of any importance is all in preflops
and even that I'm sure there are a lot of times where a marginal but slighty +EV or 0EV decisions show up as contributing to -EV (thus making it look like you run good) |
|
Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
| |
| On August 03 2008 04:07 tloapc wrote:
hmm so I should say I run goot? |
no, you should say, as gawdawaful pointed out, that it means shit |
|
Make it rain$$$ | Last edit: 03/08/2008 05:20 |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Aug 03 2008 05:24. Posts 2591 | | |
yes, it never meant anything to me
and I still don't get what importance it even has for existing, just figured maybe there was something |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
Shabbzoy   United Kingdom. Aug 03 2008 05:40. Posts 841 | | |
it means exactly what its supposed to mean outside of maybe some small card removal effects
it is however only an analysis of one small aspect of how lucky someone is(and very possibly a relatively insignificant one) |
|
|
|