0
|
wakeboarrder   United States. Aug 04 2008 17:09. Posts 444 | | |
Can someone tell me if i played like shit at 200nl or ran bad...Im ready to here the truth so if i suck idc jus help me out
|
|
|
1
|
hansen jr.   Sweden. Aug 04 2008 17:13. Posts 3735 | | |
|
|
0
|
wakeboarrder   United States. Aug 04 2008 17:20. Posts 444 | | |
i tilted alot playin 200nl...can someone tell me what everythign means |
|
|
1
|
LazyFisH   Australia. Aug 04 2008 17:26. Posts 686 | | |
You are running good and getting it in bad. |
|
|
1
|
k2o4   United States. Aug 04 2008 17:28. Posts 4803 | | |
looks like you played well for the first 20k hands or so, then you ran well All-in for a bit and then started getting it all-in really bad for a while.
On the first graph:
green = what you actually won
red = expected value (so if the play you made had +ev or -ev)
blue = showdown winnings, which is just what you won in hands that went to showdown
Basically compare the blue to the red, because without going to showdown and seeing their hand it can't determine EV. If they're similar it means you ran about even. If red is higher then your an bad, if blue is higher than you ran good. The gap you have isn't really huge so you ran a little bad, but notice that blue and red both went downhill overall so it means you were playing bad and ran kinda bad at the same time.
Also, your green is below by a good amount which means that when you add in hands where you didn't go to showdown you lose even more. So you're losing a lot of money in hands that don't go to showdown. Maybe chasing bad draws and having to fold, maybe bad bluffs and folding when re-raised, shit like that.
Overall the graph seems to say you played ok for 20k hands and then you spewed for the rest of the time.
Also, on the luck graph it's clear that with All-in luck you are getting it in badly but running well and winning anyway. |
|
InnovativeYogis.com | Last edit: 04/08/2008 17:30 |
|
|
1
|
lebowski   Greece. Aug 04 2008 17:33. Posts 9205 | | |
yea but getting it in with an underset or overpair vs set or low flush vs high flush doesn't mean you suck so I don't get where this thing helps |
|
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
|
gawdawaful   Canada. Aug 04 2008 17:39. Posts 9012 | | |
pokerEV is pretty useless |
|
Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
|
Bejamin1   Canada. Aug 04 2008 17:55. Posts 7042 | | |
You run sick good in all-in luck and are putting it in bad. Zero expected return for your all-ins on 65k hands is pretty bad. That should be very concerning to you considering the All-In calculation is just a math equity solution once all the hole-cards are known. It's not some random trixy sklansky bucks equation or anything like that. |
|
Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
|
0
|
wakeboarrder   United States. Aug 04 2008 18:08. Posts 444 | | |
in other words wut should i be doing differently |
|
|
1
|
djforever   Canada. Aug 04 2008 18:14. Posts 1510 | | |
you appear to run good. pm me or msg me on aim and ill sweat you sometime. |
|
| Last edit: 04/08/2008 19:07 |
|
|
1
|
NighTLesS   United States. Aug 04 2008 18:19. Posts 238 | | |
get your money in, with better cards |
|
Am i the only one that still plays SC once a week, as bet games?? | |
|
|
1
|
LazyFisH   Australia. Aug 04 2008 18:25. Posts 686 | | |
It's pretty hard to tell what exactly you are doing wrong by looking at the graph but if I had to guess I'd say you are spewing all over the place. |
|
|
|