1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 05:11. Posts 11385 | | |
Formings of social peer groups. (long term, male)
________
Member one is the Alpha-Male.
Member two is 2nd most alpha (obv) Typically in long term relationships M1 and M2 are best friends.
Member three is close emotionally and physically with m1 and m2. However, he is generally the one of the group who is made fun of and picked on. He is essential for M1/M2 (gotta add more detail here)
Anyone below m3 is introverted and has little to no effect to the workings of the social group. We will call them outcasts.
In a true group setting long term based, there should be no more than 3 members in a social group. However, the 3rd member of a peer group can easily be misidentified and seems easily interchangeable.
ex- in a setting with four people you might not even be an m3, you're an outcast. However, in a group of four with two different people and two people from the group before you are now the m2. Power, age, and social status all determine this and where your total rank sets you vaguely determines your position.
In the first few meetings among people who are not familiar with one another we will consider to not really be social. This phase is more or less everyone acquainting themselves with each other's alpha and determining ranks. Once ranks have been established social interaction can take place.
there is also a hierarchy of social groups in terms of alpha.
So. In this instance of theory, we define alpha as our feature which determines where we sit in social peer groups.
________
Rules
M1 Starts the group for recognition and fame. Being M1 is good for acquiring all of this within your equal female counterparts in terms of social status.
M2 joins because he is yet to gather enough power, age or social status to start his own group or because he has a secret "man-crush?" (i don't know how to describe this without making up a new term) for this person that he wants nothing but to follow and loves them so much that he has no problem forfeiting alpha to be associated with them
M3 joins because he is of a often much lower peer group and it’s his big chance to move up. Should he garner enough skill that rubs off of M1/M2 He will eventually upgrade. M3 is the expendable unit of all social groups, he is there temporarily to feed and grow.
________
M1 is typically the life of the group. He makes all decisions and leads the group
M2 will always agree with #1, if he isn’t agreeing there are serious problems within the workings of the social group. The group will temporarily break and if things aren’t resolved you will find both seeking new peer groups and both attempting to be M1(Except for m2followers which are described below). M3 will always follow one of these two in hopes of moving up the ladder. M1 should never fail @ forming a new social group however he may have "man crush syndrome" and in a power drunk thirst join a higher alpha group as a M2/M3.
M3 Can vary, he may either agree or disagree. Should he agree it doesn’t really matter, should he disagree he will most likely be berated for his comment and end up agreeing anyway or move on and try to form his own peer group.
________
In times when M1 is absent M2 will no longer disrespect M3. M2 can be categorized in two variations. Someone who always follows or someone that wants alpha glory. In the first case M3 will very often become the "alpha" of the two and actually act as the leader. Should the M2 have higher aspirations in his triangle, he has dibs on being the acting alpha in the absence of the M1. It seems, however a very common occurrence for the m3 to take alpha over the m2.
It seems as though M2's are the only ambiguous personality types. People who are generally M2's and are more of the "mancrush" type will always be M2's. Presumably because anyone who can be an M1 would only upgrade to a higher alpha group quickly in a m3 fashion and/or because m3's are only in the 3 spot because they are leeching trying to gain alpha.
in short m2's are generally ambitionless and happy with how things are. M1 and M3 have higher goals.
Furthermore, should the M2 be absent from the group the M1 will no longer disrespect the M3 and the M3 will move up to the spot of M2 immediately.
________
Short conclusion
Until your body can decipher everyone within the whole group's alpha level social interaction isn't social yet.
Alpha presides in both the groups as a whole in comparison to other groups and individually within the group.
3 people max for interaction although in some instances like a party I think the m3 can be swapped quite often in the span of a very short amount of time. However say the group was stranded on some island for the rest of their lives, eventually someone will take the 3hole for good.
The basis of my entire theory lies dearly in the fact that given enough time to know one another in a situation including 3+ people eventually all of this will play out.
In groups of less than 3 you are forced to be social and you generally unless way out of the other person's league in terms of alpha will have equal respect for one another.
|
|
WHAT IS THIS | Last edit: 12/08/2008 08:14 |
|
|
1
|
Silver_nz   New Zealand. Aug 12 2008 05:25. Posts 5647 | | |
not really a common pattern in my experience. often social structure among friends is pretty flexible, and its pretty hard to squash real people into categories like this.
you just end up defining yourself down into misery 8D |
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 05:30. Posts 11385 | | |
take a group of people talking
watch them.
One will talk furiously, he is the alpha
The person he directs his speech to is #2
The 3rd person is harder to distinguish, given enough time with observation he will be the 3rd most talkative person there. I really suck @ explaining all of this that ive been building up from thinking about this for a long time now. |
|
|
|
1
|
Heero   United States. Aug 12 2008 05:34. Posts 145 | | |
I'm considering them as separate possibilities anyway.
The first one I've never really seen, but I won't deny it's possible.
The second one quite probably happens, but I'd stay the fuck away from those kinds of people.
The third is the one I've seen the most, in some variation.
In my experience, the most accurate generalization I can find is that M1 is absolutely the alpha in any group, and M2's main qualification is that he's close to M1. |
|
| Last edit: 12/08/2008 05:34 |
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 05:34. Posts 11385 | | |
btw im not done yet @ all but there is no sense in posting all of it on here and getting tl;dr's
if anyone is interested when im finished i will repost |
|
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 05:41. Posts 11385 | | |
| On August 12 2008 04:34 Heero wrote:
I'm considering them as separate possibilities anyway.
The first one I've never really seen, but I won't deny it's possible.
The second one quite probably happens, but I'd stay the fuck away from those kinds of people.
The third is the one I've seen the most, in some variation.
In my experience, the most accurate generalization I can find is that M1 is absolutely the alpha in any group, and M2's main qualification is that he's close to M1. |
Just to use easy examples that have come quickly to my mind, movies. Baseketball and Van Wilder are awesome examples. They show the 3man social group theory @ it's flying colors.
and lol @ stay away from those people im assuming everyone takes part in this including yourself and me. |
|
WHAT IS THIS | Last edit: 12/08/2008 05:57 |
|
|
1
|
Shabbzoy   United Kingdom. Aug 12 2008 05:44. Posts 841 | | |
seems like a depressing view of the world youve got
in my experience people can coexist in states of mutual respect and rise above this sort of animal categorisation |
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 05:51. Posts 11385 | | |
How is it depressing? Realize you have no free will and realize that most ideas of beautiful human skill and specialness and not real.
We all are animals; we aren't special in any way except that we have evolved to believe we are above god and can defy what makes us who we are.
I'm just realistic.
edit - im agnostic so my term of god is taken in that context plz |
|
WHAT IS THIS | Last edit: 12/08/2008 05:53 |
|
|
4
|
Baalim   Mexico. Aug 12 2008 05:52. Posts 34262 | | |
mutual respect doesnt imply that none of the individuals is the alpha male, it would be naive to ignore that.
I am a believe in human equity but im also a realist and as such i actually realize my friend group is a bit alike what CrownRoyal explained.
I used to be M2 until M1 left to go study in Italy, he was M1 because we have alike alpha male characteristics however he was more involved with the people we hanged out to so he had the "contacts", he left and now i am M1 despise the fact im still the least social of my other 2 friends now (which are hard to categorize any as alpha).
There is a flaw in your theory imo from my personal experience, now that im the least social M1 (hanging with a very mild M2 and a M3) the mild M2 and the M3 interact between each other much more because they need to cuz they are the social ones so the M3 has actually much "power" than in a regular M1 M2 group cuz he can swing the M2 decition equalling forces with me. |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 05:55. Posts 11385 | | |
good point baal
i hadn't thought about that much but i think you're onto something. |
|
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 06:03. Posts 11385 | | |
in my main group im a m3 and our alpha got a gf and the m2 and I became really close and I almost took over in a sense.
but when the alpha is around things turn back to normal...
I'm confused now because that changes a lot of what I had in mind.
Maybe personality has as much to do with your status as m1-m3 in a group where m1 and m3 can interchange depending on the group and a m2 will more usually be an m2. |
|
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 06:08. Posts 11385 | | |
Also to further prove my point on tri-alphaoriented-malegroups
When you're getting in a vehicle the greatest % of the time the alpha will be the driver, the m2 will ride shotgun and the m3 will ride where ever he can. |
|
|
|
1
|
Artanis[Xp]   Netherlands. Aug 12 2008 06:35. Posts 4697 | | |
I'm in a group of four M2's
which would explain why nothing ever gets done |
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 06:37. Posts 11385 | | |
Alright baal i just took a shower and I think I can add this to my theory.
In times when M1 is absent M2 will no longer disrespect M3. M2 can be categorized in two variations. Someone who always follows or someone that wants alpha glory. In the first case M3 will very often become the "alpha" of the two and actually act as the leader. Should the M2 have higher aspirations in his triangle, he has dibs on being the acting alpha in the absence of the M1. It seems a very unrare occurrence for the m3 to take alpha over the m2.
It seems as though M2's are the only ambiguous personality types. People who are generally M2's and are more of the "mancrush" type will always be M2's. Presumably because anyone who can be an M1 would only upgrade to a higher alpha group quickly in a m3 fashion and/or because m3's are only in the 3 spot because they are leeching trying to gain alpha.
in short m2's are generally ambitionless and happy with how things are. M1 and M3 have higher goals.
Should the M2 be absent from the group the M1 will no longer disrespect the M3 and the M3 will move up to the spot of M2 immediately. |
|
|
|
1
|
Heero   United States. Aug 12 2008 06:42. Posts 145 | | |
Baseketball is a movie dude.
You do make a crucial point in that M2 usually don't become M1. |
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 06:42. Posts 11385 | | |
btw im not saying you only have 2 friends in your life.
I'm saying that when you hang out with a group of 3+ people who are guys these rules take precedent and if you guys all know each other than the rules are imbued in your mind.
The reason it seems like im saying that you only have 2 friends is that im referring mainly to your main group because they are the ones you associate with the most |
|
|
|
4
|
Baalim   Mexico. Aug 12 2008 07:01. Posts 34262 | | |
| On August 12 2008 05:08 CrownRoyal wrote:
Also to further prove my point on tri-alphaoriented-malegroups
When you're getting in a vehicle the greatest % of the time the alpha will be the driver, the m2 will ride shotgun and the m3 will ride where ever he can. |
lol this is hillariously accurate, our M3 always always rides in the backseat, almost like its implied. |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
|
TheGuru   Sweden. Aug 12 2008 07:17. Posts 532 | | |
I'm the only one of my friends with a car so I guess I'm M1 -_- |
|
There is no such thing as luck. There is only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe. - Robert A. Heinlein (Time Enough for Love) | |
|
|
1
|
TheGuru   Sweden. Aug 12 2008 07:18. Posts 532 | | |
Also very interesting read! |
|
There is no such thing as luck. There is only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe. - Robert A. Heinlein (Time Enough for Love) | |
|
|
1
|
CrownRoyal   United States. Aug 12 2008 07:37. Posts 11385 | | |
there are a lot of holes in what ive posted already and things that contradict what ive written.
I've nearly changed my mind about some core things too. Oh well, this isn't a book or something and its just me throwing around ideas to get a solid idea of what I really know and you guys punching holes in it til i can make it all fit and make sense. |
|
WHAT IS THIS | Last edit: 12/08/2008 07:37 |
|
|
|