i lose

keep ur head up bro.

You're running like 18bi under expectation.

Isnt $EV in HEM just the all-in expectation ?
So u can hardly say he runs like 18BI under expectation ?

U can assume that he probably runs bad when his all-in expectation is in the green and he is significantly in the red in overall results.
I really think its probably the best thing for u to get a decent FR coach
250$/h sounds too much though.

On the other hand i am not so surprised 13/10 doesnt work so well on Nl200 anymore.
the style is easily exploitable and there should be enough players at NL200 who can take advantage of that

the numbers are fine. its all about the 3bet and 4bet plays against regs, and hands have to hold against donks. If those dont go well = downswing.

http://www.deucescracked.com/coaching

no real recommendations, but just try and see who u get along with and think is the best for u. they are all very good.

if u have to ask then i'd say i'd go with wilt on tilt.

in general i think watching videos is best. coaching can get very expensive. dont expect 2 lessons to make u a superstar (damn thats fuckin $600 right there). coaching is long term imo. u develop a relationship with ur coach and improve ur game from there.

some suggestions:
1. make video for this site and ppl will help for free and u can watch how u think can play
2. get a coach (prepare to spend a lot of $, since spewin $300/hr for 1 or 2 lessons and not wantin more is just like lightin $ on fire)
3. take a break and clear ur head.

On October 10 2008 19:30 PplusAD wrote: On the other hand i am not so surprised 13/10 doesnt work so well on Nl200 anymore. the style is easily exploitable and there should be enough players at NL200 who can take advantage of that

are you just trying to tilt our poor man here, you talking about nl 200 fr carries almost no weight as this is all very speculative and somewhat out of line =/.. i mean, because as i understand even during your more successful times you were a hu / 6max player and in lower stakes?

ya rockman, 99% of the winning players at midstakes fr play similar to 14/10

if you say so im just trying to make sure we're all thinking on our feet especially in hard times

On October 10 2008 19:30 PplusAD wrote: On the other hand i am not so surprised 13/10 doesnt work so well on Nl200 anymore. the style is easily exploitable and there should be enough players at NL200 who can take advantage of that

I don't want to say this is a foolish statement cuz i don't want to hurt your feelings.

but this is really a foolish foolish statement.

okay then i overestimate that Nl200 FR regs ....

@ rockman i ve played up to Nl200 , too
but ure right about the 6max and HU vs Fullring part.
Ive only played like 6K hands at NL50 FR NL100 and NL200 were all 6max and HU

I ve seen some higher stakes FR players , though and they were like 17/14

The reason i say this is that at things like NL1000 6 max you'll have guys who run something like 20/18 and as high as like 35/30 (rofl).

but yet they all can make money. Mostly it's because they adjust to villians. I play more tight then loose, but against certain villians... i mean Exhilarate is an example he had 4 bet me from the blinds and i think i had JJ and i called. I'd have folded that vs most anyone else in FR but i knew he was capable of 4 betting REALLY light. So it doesn't matter that i run at about 15/12 in FR what matters is i adjust my play based on the play of villians. Yeah higher stakes FR players play a bit more loose but it's because ALL the villians are agressive so they have to increase the range at what hands they play.

So yeah i think stats are very overrated by that logic. So when you say 13/10 doesn't work at NL200 that's crazy .. how does playing tight not work? I mean i'm sure PplusAD as a 6 max player when you face certain fishes you get it in really light but it's not like your stats are changed. Anyway i'm rambling but you get the picture.