https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 338 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 18:56

Obama, War on Brains

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Poker Blogs
TenBagger   United States. Nov 11 2008 09:26. Posts 2018
Not sure how many of you read the OP-Ed section of the NYTimes but Kristof had an excellent article today that I would like to share with the community. Goes well with my previous blog post which got a grand total of 6 page views. I copied it below but you can read it in the original format here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/opinion/09kristof.html?em

OBAMA AND THE WAR ON BRAINS

By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: November 9, 2008

Barack Obama’s election is a milestone in more than his pigmentation. The second most remarkable thing about his election is that American voters have just picked a president who is an open, out-of-the-closet, practicing intellectual.

Maybe, just maybe, the result will be a step away from the anti-intellectualism that has long been a strain in American life. Smart and educated leadership is no panacea, but we’ve seen recently that the converse — a White House that scorns expertise and shrugs at nuance — doesn’t get very far either.

We can’t solve our educational challenges when, according to polls, Americans are approximately as likely to believe in flying saucers as in evolution, and when one-fifth of Americans believe that the sun orbits the Earth.

Almost half of young Americans said in a 2006 poll that it was not necessary to know the locations of countries where important news was made. That must be a relief to Sarah Palin, who, according to Fox News, didn’t realize that Africa was a continent rather than a country.

Perhaps John Kennedy was the last president who was unapologetic about his intellect and about luring the best minds to his cabinet. More recently, we’ve had some smart and well-educated presidents who scrambled to hide it. Richard Nixon was a self-loathing intellectual, and Bill Clinton camouflaged a fulgent brain behind folksy Arkansas aphorisms about hogs.

As for President Bush, he adopted anti-intellectualism as administration policy, repeatedly rejecting expertise (from Middle East experts, climate scientists and reproductive health specialists). Mr. Bush is smart in the sense of remembering facts and faces, yet I can’t think of anybody I’ve ever interviewed who appeared so uninterested in ideas.

At least since Adlai Stevenson’s campaigns for the presidency in the 1950s, it’s been a disadvantage in American politics to seem too learned. Thoughtfulness is portrayed as wimpishness, and careful deliberation is for sissies. The social critic William Burroughs once bluntly declared that “intellectuals are deviants in the U.S.”

(It doesn’t help that intellectuals are often as full of themselves as of ideas. After one of Stevenson’s high-brow speeches, an admirer yelled out something like, You’ll have the vote of every thinking American! Stevenson is said to have shouted back: That’s not enough. I need a majority!)

Yet times may be changing. How else do we explain the election in 2008 of an Ivy League-educated law professor who has favorite philosophers and poets?

Granted, Mr. Obama may have been protected from accusations of excessive intelligence by his race. That distracted everyone, and as a black man he didn’t fit the stereotype of a pointy-head ivory tower elitist. But it may also be that President Bush has discredited superficiality.

An intellectual is a person interested in ideas and comfortable with complexity. Intellectuals read the classics, even when no one is looking, because they appreciate the lessons of Sophocles and Shakespeare that the world abounds in uncertainties and contradictions, and — President Bush, lend me your ears — that leaders self-destruct when they become too rigid and too intoxicated with the fumes of moral clarity.

(Intellectuals are for real. In contrast, a pedant is a supercilious show-off who drops references to Sophocles and masks his shallowness by using words like “fulgent” and “supercilious.”)

Mr. Obama, unlike most politicians near a microphone, exults in complexity. He doesn’t condescend or oversimplify nearly as much as politicians often do, and he speaks in paragraphs rather than sound bites. Global Language Monitor, which follows linguistic issues, reports that in the final debate, Mr. Obama spoke at a ninth-grade reading level, while John McCain spoke at a seventh-grade level.

As Mr. Obama prepares to take office, I wish I could say that smart people have a great record in power. They don’t. Just think of Emperor Nero, who was one of the most intellectual of ancient rulers — and who also killed his brother, his mother and his pregnant wife; then castrated and married a slave boy who resembled his wife; probably set fire to Rome; and turned Christians into human torches to light his gardens.

James Garfield could simultaneously write Greek with one hand and Latin with the other, Thomas Jefferson was a dazzling scholar and inventor, and John Adams typically carried a book of poetry. Yet all were outclassed by George Washington, who was among the least intellectual of our early presidents.

Yet as Mr. Obama goes to Washington, I’m hopeful that his fertile mind will set a new tone for our country. Maybe someday soon our leaders no longer will have to shuffle in shame when they’re caught with brains in their heads.

0 votes
Facebook Twitter

lebowski   Greece. Nov 11 2008 10:04. Posts 9205

good last two blog posts,I haven't seen the Bush documentary yet but I will

new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... 

SakiSaki    Sweden. Nov 11 2008 10:07. Posts 9685

Very good article!

what wackass site is this nigga?  

Baalim   Mexico. Nov 11 2008 11:05. Posts 34260

" one-fifth of Americans believe that the sun orbits the Earth."

i know americans are stupid but i cannot believe that

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

TenBagger   United States. Nov 11 2008 11:19. Posts 2018

sad but true, believe it.

if 1/2 believe in creationism, then 1/5 believing that the sun orbits the earth is quite believable.

however, even the most educated among us also believe in falsehoods. sure they are not as ridiculous as the example above, but when we assume we know it all and stop having an open mind for knowledge, then we become no better than the rednecks who believe that the sun orbits the earth.


John Galt   Canada. Nov 11 2008 11:53. Posts 618

very very true
even among university students, sometimes i dont know if they truly value intellect

MaidenFan: Stop worrying about what might be or what coulda been, the former is totally out of your control, and the latter is nothing but a twisted fantasy 

Jelle   Belgium. Nov 11 2008 12:48. Posts 3476


  On November 11 2008 10:19 TenBagger wrote:
if 1/2 believe in creationism, then 1/5 believing that the sun orbits the earth is quite believable.



I don't believe that either, though. I think a lot of people feel like they "have to" say they believe in creationism because of their social circle and stuff. They're not really answering "do you believe in.." they feel like the question is "who's side are you on? the christians or the bigots?"

I don't think it's a good measure of how smart they are, either

GroT 

Jelle   Belgium. Nov 11 2008 13:00. Posts 3476

With the other question it's even more so. I think faith could again have an impact on their answer (god's earth has to be important so the sun prolly revolves around it) and also it's simply easy to answer incorrectly if you don't think it through.

I remember always thinking you had to remember this question just like you remember the difference between left and right and getting the answer wrong over and over until some teacher finally drew a huge sun and a tiny earth on the board and then asked me the question again; "which do you think revolves around which?" It doesn't really matter that I was just a kid, those ppl just haven't had it explained to them decently one time or answered too quickly without thinking.

I don't think anyone is stupid for getting that question wrong.. and lolling at them and saying theyre stupid probably makes people get this attitude of "learning that stuff is for brainiacs anyway, not for me"

GroT 

TenBagger   United States. Nov 11 2008 13:03. Posts 2018

I agree it isn't necessarily a measure of their intelligence.

But I totally believe those statistics because I have seen them with my own eyes. I see your point, but it is like saying how many Christians REALLY believe in jesus and his resurrection? Of course there may be some with doubts that may answer yes because of social pressures. But for the most part, it is precisely those social pressures that suppress the doubts and they effectively become believers.

The bigger tragedy is as Kristof notes the culture of anti-intellectualism. Creationism undermines the entire field of science. Those statistics are supported by other statistics that show the US trailing far behind in field such as math and science. Sure they may have the raw brain power to understand and comprehend complex issues but what use is that when one is so closed minded as to not even seek knowledge and truth?


TenBagger   United States. Nov 11 2008 13:16. Posts 2018


  [B]I don't think anyone is stupid for getting that question wrong.. and lolling at them and saying theyre stupid probably makes people get this attitude of "learning that stuff is for brainiacs anyway, not for me"


.
They are definitely not getting that attitude. Their attitude is not of self doubt but of self assurance. They are for the most part 100% positive that the world was created 5000 years ago in 7 days and that evolution is a big hoax. See grot, the problem is not that one doesn't know or understand. It is when one refuses to have an open mind. There are many school districts in the US that are trying to ban the teaching of evolution and/or teaching creationism as a science and not religion. This is not a case of mixing up left and right or some kid trying to learn algebra but failing and saying fuck it I suck at math and giving up. Although I am not religious, I have no problem with religion. I do have a problem when religion is passed off as science and the US is the only country in the world that is trying to teach creationism in science class.

You have school boards made up of redneck parents forcing science teachers to teach this stuff against their will. This mentality is similar to Bush ignoring the advice of the entire scientific community on global warming. The education system in much of the US is so fucked beyond belief. So much that someone from mexico and belgium find it hard to believe. Well guys, it is that fucked up. It is not a mix up of left and right. And it isn't just limited to math and science. The average american's knowledge of geography is so horrible that it wasn't that shocking when the vice presidential candidate thought that africa was a country. Hopefully, Obama will usher in a new ag of thought and reason to America.


capaneo   Canada. Nov 11 2008 14:56. Posts 8465

OMG this article is EXACTLY what I was trying to say someone. I remember I wrote a post basically saying the same thing.
Obama is smart and thats the great thing about him.
Also he is black and thats another great thing about him. Getting people excited and proofing that racism in US is at a different stage at least(Im no going to say there is NO racism.) Specially showing that anyone can be president. just look at Obama.

In US everyone is happy as long as all the prices are rising. Unless its crude oil - Marc Faber 

Graisseux   Canada. Nov 11 2008 15:10. Posts 474


  On November 11 2008 11:48 Jelle wrote:
Show nested quote +



I don't believe that either, though. I think a lot of people feel like they "have to" say they believe in creationism because of their social circle and stuff. They're not really answering "do you believe in.." they feel like the question is "who's side are you on? the christians or the bigots?"

I don't think it's a good measure of how smart they are, either


Thinking according to a social circle, therefore not asking questions, isn't thinking clearly. I think clear thinkers are smart while most of those people are blind and will stay blind, no matter how hard you try to teach them.


NeillyJQ   United States. Nov 13 2008 03:26. Posts 8947

great post and a good read

Just remember you need to be god damn sure about their tendencies. -Artanis11 http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/neillyaa/ 

 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap