1
|
luddite   United States. Nov 22 2008 21:10. Posts 398 | | |
I'm looking at how much i've won with which type of hands right now, in PT3, and the results are quite surprising.
Straight flush: +6
Four of a kind: +89
Full house: +445
Flush: +323
Straight: +105
Three of a kind: +539
Two pair: -122
one pair: -609
high card: -434
Total: 344
Mostly I'm just shocked at how much money I've lost with just one pair, especially when you consider that I've made +227 from AA. Right now my winnings from monster hands are just enough to overcome my losses from one pair. Is this normal? I'm curious to see what the distribution looks like for others, especially looser players.
edit: I think this is somewhat inaccurate because it includes hands I folded PF. So for example, if i folded 27 PF and the flop came 222, it would count as me losing money with Four of a Kind. If you give me back the ~1000 that I've paid in blinds, I can see that my pairs are actually profitable
|
|
| Last edit: 22/11/2008 21:40 |
|
|
1
|
fenner   Australia. Nov 22 2008 21:17. Posts 2188 | | |
Since one pair is ANY one pair and not just top pair i dont think its very surprising |
|
|
1
|
Sicks Macks   United States. Nov 22 2008 21:17. Posts 3929 | | |
Similar proportions for me... though less losses with one pair for me (I'm a nit), and less winnings with flushes (I'm a nit). Three of a kind + full house is the nuuurts. I wish they had a TP tab, cause I should hope I'm profitable there. |
|
|
|
1
|
luddite   United States. Nov 22 2008 21:23. Posts 398 | | |
yeah I agree, flopping TPTK is very different from attempting to setmine with 22 and missing. I wish I could figure out how much I've made just from set mining, I imagine it's not really all that much overall. |
|
|
1
|
YESHBoOM   Belgium. Nov 22 2008 21:28. Posts 159 | | |
Straight flush: +44.70
Four of a kind: +120.35
Full House: +1171.25
Flush: +778.50
Straight: +775.95
Three of a kind: +1284.55
Two pair: +656.75
One pair: -2045.90
High card: -1745.50
what shocks me more I won $16,960.85 from others and lost $14,064.25 playing NL25 |
|
|
1
|
luddite   United States. Nov 22 2008 21:36. Posts 398 | | |
others meaning higher limits I'm guessing? |
|
|
1
|
Sicks Macks   United States. Nov 22 2008 21:36. Posts 3929 | | |
Haha, because of pf folding, I've lost money with straight flushes. I guess I should play more sooted cards. |
|
|
|
1
|
YESHBoOM   Belgium. Nov 22 2008 21:37. Posts 159 | | |
no other players luddite, it's in the 'vs player' tab
these numbers don't mean anything anyways but are just fun to watch I'm not even sure if those huge numbers mean what I think they mean |
|
| Last edit: 22/11/2008 21:41 |
|
|
1
|
luddite   United States. Nov 22 2008 21:42. Posts 398 | | |
Oh ok i undertand now YESH. I thought you meant you had a total loss of 14k playing NL25 and I was like woah... gambling problem much? |
|
|
|