https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 704 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 16:04

first blog post :o

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Poker Blogs
Orome   Switzerland. Jan 08 2009 02:11. Posts 214
Hi everyone!

I guess most of you don't know me, I've posted on teamliquid for more than 5 years, but only recently got into poker. Maybe some of you saw me post this thread 2 months ago asking for help.

Anyway, now, 2 months into my poker career it seemed like a good idea to start a blog to gather my thoughts on how poker has been so far and to think about goals.

For those (which I guess is almost everyone lol) not interested in my poker life story, there's a graph below.

I started at NL2 full ring, buying in for 2$ like Grot suggested in his guide with a $20 bankroll, trying to be a winning player from the start. I went broke, deposited another 20, went broke again, deposited another 20 and went broke yet again.

Looking back I'm amazed at how badly I must've been playing to manage to lose 60$ on NL2, but luckily I seem to have overcome the uber newbie stage after losing those third 20$ and things have been going up ever since.

I think the one thing that made me a winning player at NL2 was starting to play 4 tables. I'd been 1 tabling before and spewing massively when I got bored or things weren't going my way. Getting your aces cracked when you're 20 tabling isn't that big a deal, but when you're a new player just playing one table, getting dealt aces like once every 2 hours, that puts you on major tilt.

I managed to get up to 100$ with NL2, then switched to NL5 where I think I ~12 tabled most of the time. NL5 doesn't seem to be much different from NL2, there might be less complete spewmonkeys that go AI preflop every second hand, but people are still as big calling stations as on NL2.

After working my way up to 200$, I played like 3k hands of NL10 (1 session of 10 tabling I think), then decided to take a 8 buyin shot at NL25. I 4-tabled NL25 for a bit and couldn't understand why I wasn't making big money like before. Finally I realized that poker might have something to do with actually thinking and that playing like a complete robot might not be a successful strategy anymore. I had a bb/100 of like 0.5 after like 7k hands on NL25, almost half the hands I played on that limit.

Things have been going pretty well since then, I went up to 500 and decided to take a 10 buyin shot at NL50 like a week ago. My bankroll's 720 right now and I'm probably going to stick to 25/50 until I'm at 2k.

I guess some of you will say I'm taking too big risks with my bankroll, but I feel like I can sustain the same winrate 2 tabling NL50 as 10 tabling NL25 and I've learnt a huge deal more about poker playing 2 tables than 10 tabling like a robot.

Apart from making like 3-4 completely tilty spews (on 2 of which I sucked out luckily) I'm very happy with how I've been playing NL50 so far, I opened my game and went from 15/11 to 25/20 in the last few days which is really helping as there are definitely less 60/0/1 guys than on NL25.

I think the thing that gives me an edge over most regulars on NL50 is that by only 2 tabling I'm able to identify my opponent types a lot better and I can watch and take notes on how they play any hand they show down. I happily stacked off with AT on a AKQxx board against a guy who I knew would call down with a lot worse for example. If I hadn't identified what kind of player he was beforehand (and his stats didn't really indicate that he was a huge calling station) I would never have done that.

From what I've learned so far, the most important aspects of poker seem to me to be logic, psychology and adaptation. I guess probability is also important, but that seems a lot easier than the other three. Few things seem to be absolute, you might take completely different lines in the exact same hand depending on what kind of player the villain is. By playing only two tables I think I'm learning a lot more and preparing myself better for when I move up and the games get tougher.

As for goals, I'm just going to continue investing quite a lot of time into poker and see where it takes me. I would love playing this game professionally while still continuing my studies at university

My lifetime graph so far: (the first 40$ or so that I lost aren't included)







This turned out to be pretty long, so tl;dr I'm winning and loving poker.

0 votes
Facebook Twitter

SfydjkLm   Belarus. Jan 08 2009 02:28. Posts 3810

kekekkeke

*wink wink* 

OpWestAcct   United States. Jan 08 2009 02:35. Posts 640

Holy shit man good job. I cannot believe you have had that kind of success in only 2 months.

Fuck me 

edzwoo   United States. Jan 08 2009 02:45. Posts 5911

I strongly recommend you move back down to NL25 until you get a sufficient roll for NL50.

You said you stayed at NL10 and decided to take a 8bi shot at NL25. Based on your graph, you broke even after 3200 hands at NL10 and decided to just play underrolled at limit further than one you weren't even beating. This is a huge flaw in bankroll management, something that is extremely important and poker and you can't disrespect.

I'm not going to comment on your ability to play poker, but you aren't even at 15bis for NL50. In all seriousness as well, if you believe playing 2 tables NL50 will get you a better winrate than playing 10 tables of NL25, it means your ability to multitable is very poor, not because your skill level increases dramatically as you cut tables.

Just know 2895 hands extremely little and if do hit a downswing (inevitable), you MUST make yourself move down. If you can't do this, you aren't cut out for poker.

Make sure to remember, poker can treat you nice, but it will toss you to the ground and spit on your face when you don't expect it. Good bankroll management is the key to softening the blow.

That all being said, good job with your success so far. Keep it up!

 Last edit: 08/01/2009 02:46

Uptown   . Jan 08 2009 02:49. Posts 3557

Orome, there is 1 word to express my feelings right now as a player who started playing at roughly the same time as you.

Jealousy! <3

Half Pot! 

joLin   United States. Jan 08 2009 02:59. Posts 3818

hi =) i recognize you from TL. that is a sick graph.

but ya definitely move down to 25nl. you havent hit a downswing yet and its going to be very very mentally tough when it happens, especially when you have so few buyins.

YoUr_KiLLeR @ TLLast edit: 08/01/2009 02:59

Orome   Switzerland. Jan 08 2009 03:12. Posts 214


  On January 08 2009 01:45 edzwoo wrote:
I strongly recommend you move back down to NL25 until you get a sufficient roll for NL50.

You said you stayed at NL10 and decided to take a 8bi shot at NL25. Based on your graph, you broke even after 3200 hands at NL10 and decided to just play underrolled at limit further than one you weren't even beating. This is a huge flaw in bankroll management, something that is extremely important and poker and you can't disrespect.

I'm not going to comment on your ability to play poker, but you aren't even at 15bis for NL50. In all seriousness as well, if you believe playing 2 tables NL50 will get you a better winrate than playing 10 tables of NL25, it means your ability to multitable is very poor, not because your skill level increases dramatically as you cut tables.

Just know 2895 hands extremely little and if do hit a downswing (inevitable), you MUST make yourself move down. If you can't do this, you aren't cut out for poker.

Make sure to remember, poker can treat you nice, but it will toss you to the ground and spit on your face when you don't expect it. Good bankroll management is the key to softening the blow.

That all being said, good job with your success so far. Keep it up!



I agree with pretty much everything you said, here's my reasoning for my br management so far:

1. Yes my multitabling ability's poor. I managed to get 25bb/100 on NL5 12 tabling just by playing like 14/11, c-betting every flop then giving up and stacking off with TPGK or better. When I moved up to NL25 this just wasn't enough for a solid winrate anymore. I could definitely multitable more competently now, but I would still be playing very mechanically. My first priority right now is getting better at the game, not maximizing my winrate and I feel like I'll improve much quicker 2 tabling a stake higher.

2. If I ever go beneath 600 again I'll definitely move down. Yes, even a small downswing on NL50 would hit me hard with just a 700$ bankroll, but I feel like taking the risk's worth it. Potential winnings at poker go up exponentially the higher you play (losses too obviously ), so because I can think I can beat NL50, I feel it's worth taking the risk because redepositing $200 or something wouldn't be such a big deal yet.

I wouldn't ever take chances with br management on higher stakes just because you have so much more to lose. If someone takes a shot at 10/20 with 10k and they lose 5 buyins they've just lost half the roll they've been working on their whole poker life, if I lose half my roll it's not that bad because objectively speaking it's not that much money and most time involved building it was time spent learning the game at NL2-5.

I guess you could argue that practicing good br management now is good practice for when you get to higher stakes and have exponentially more money to lose, but I feel like I'm disciplined enough to make good decisions in how I use my bankroll.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that I realize I'm taking a risk a poker player shouldn't take and that I'm not an idiot running hot thinking he can get away with anything, but right now I think the rewards for continuing to play NL50 outweigh the risks.


Orome   Switzerland. Jan 08 2009 03:17. Posts 214

Thanks for the comments guys.

btw, in every interview I've read so far from successful online players, they mentioned discussing poker with friends as one of the key aspects that helped improve their game. if anyone feels like poker with me sometimes, I'd love to exchange msn. Of course if someone better than me wants to help me with my game a bit I'd be more than greatful and if you're playing below I'd be happy to try to help you out with my very non expert opinions.


whamm!   Albania. Jan 08 2009 04:56. Posts 11625

not to sound like an ass man but...don't lie to yourself, you know it's fundamentally wrong what you're doing. You see, by playing underrolled, poker becomes 100% gambling imo, I see that you have great potential to be a solid winning player soon. Don't rush it. Rushing it now while you're running hot (coz you are really, believe me) is a good way to move up faster obv, but you're missing out on a lot of experience also encountering all kinds of scenarios and situations - experience counts a lot. Imo, microstakes is a great place to learn how to play, and get a ton of experience through the sheer number of hands you have to go through, (playing against retards also teaches you a lot lol). Don't start with the wrong foot, coz it's gonna bite you in the ass at the most hurtful time ever. You started off gambling, you made it now, all you gotta do is correct that by going for relatively safe br management. I mean, how can you say you can beat NL50 if u just played so little hands? Be safe and do the right thing, move down to NL25, own those donks there and safely get to 1k , THEN take your shot. I think you're the 20bi move up type anyway. Just don't rush it man, just don't. Trust me on this.

NEILLYAA has been through micro/lowstakes a lot before, that's why imo his 10bi shots are somewhat more justifiable ( i think)

 Last edit: 08/01/2009 05:01

Twisted    Netherlands. Jan 08 2009 07:16. Posts 10422

Taking shots is totally fine if you're in control of what you're doing (i.e. moving down at 600$ is totally fine).

If you want to take shots at 50NL when you have 15 buyins for it, that's totally fine. Not everyone has to follow a 20 buyin bankroll management (or more).

Besides, if you only play 2 tables, you obviously need a much smaller bankroll to practice correct bankroll management.

Good luck Orome~!

 Last edit: 08/01/2009 07:17

RaiZ   France. Jan 08 2009 07:23. Posts 1503

It's not such a big deal to play underolled from time to time because it allows us to play more excitingely (? spelling ?). Grinding nl2 with a 100 buyin rules, would you do that ? Most of them would say no because it wouldn't be poker anymore, afterall we're playing for fun right ? Sure money is important, but if we don't get any fun with playing at all then we will NEVER improve (or not improve as much as gamboling).
You know, it reminds me of a story where there is a child and his father, and the child start asking something among the lines : I wonder if it's dangerous to (put something that could fear you out something like a electricity line) and then the father say : Why don't you try ? Child try get hurt and learnt. So he won't ever do the same thing unless he knows what he's up to.
It's the same for poker.
End story

Shin-il : Yeah it was very very very good for me too. Rekrul : YOU MOTHER FUCKING FUCKING SON OF A BITCHLast edit: 08/01/2009 07:24

whamm!   Albania. Jan 08 2009 10:25. Posts 11625

br management is based on math, not skill. some get a better run of cards than others during the building stages, so be it. if you feel you can risk it, then its probably ok too. it will jst be confusing when u have to move down when u hit a bad when you do start something the wrong way, then itll be like , 1 table of 100nl etc. do what you feel you can handle. good luck


Orome   Switzerland. Jan 08 2009 10:37. Posts 214


  On January 08 2009 03:56 whamm! wrote:
not to sound like an ass man but...don't lie to yourself, you know it's fundamentally wrong what you're doing. You see, by playing underrolled, poker becomes 100% gambling imo, I see that you have great potential to be a solid winning player soon. Don't rush it. Rushing it now while you're running hot (coz you are really, believe me) is a good way to move up faster obv, but you're missing out on a lot of experience also encountering all kinds of scenarios and situations - experience counts a lot. Imo, microstakes is a great place to learn how to play, and get a ton of experience through the sheer number of hands you have to go through, (playing against retards also teaches you a lot lol). Don't start with the wrong foot, coz it's gonna bite you in the ass at the most hurtful time ever. You started off gambling, you made it now, all you gotta do is correct that by going for relatively safe br management. I mean, how can you say you can beat NL50 if u just played so little hands? Be safe and do the right thing, move down to NL25, own those donks there and safely get to 1k , THEN take your shot. I think you're the 20bi move up type anyway. Just don't rush it man, just don't. Trust me on this.

NEILLYAA has been through micro/lowstakes a lot before, that's why imo his 10bi shots are somewhat more justifiable ( i think)



I'm not saying I'm beating NL50, it's way too soon for me to say that, but based on what I've seen so far I feel confident I can beat it, most people I've played so far seem really exploitable.

I'm seriously considering moving down based on what all of you have been saying, I think if Twisted hadn't come in and said it was fine I'd be back at NL25 by now.

what do you mean by 'you're the 20bi move up type' btw?

 Last edit: 08/01/2009 10:41

RaiZ   France. Jan 08 2009 11:58. Posts 1503

It's somewhat too low for an young poker player to move up at only 20bi as you won't learn enough on these limits.
I think that's what he means.
You can feel free for rush but i'm pretty sure you won't handle the downswing.
Better get a downswing at nl5 or 10 rather than nl50 right ?
Don't hesitate to move down, i repeat, DON'T HESITATE, even if you feel you got an edge cauz ur bankroll simply won't permit it.
Just so you get an idea : Catyoul (Catul now i think?) said that for instance if you stick to a 50bi rule you'd have way less chances to get bankrupt than with a 10bi rule even with the bigger edge / favorites hands and so on.
Just move down if you get sucked out even if you were 90% favourite.

Shin-il : Yeah it was very very very good for me too. Rekrul : YOU MOTHER FUCKING FUCKING SON OF A BITCH 

whamm!   Albania. Jan 08 2009 12:21. Posts 11625


  On January 08 2009 09:37 Orome wrote:
Show nested quote +



I'm not saying I'm beating NL50, it's way too soon for me to say that, but based on what I've seen so far I feel confident I can beat it, most people I've played so far seem really exploitable.

I'm seriously considering moving down based on what all of you have been saying, I think if Twisted hadn't come in and said it was fine I'd be back at NL25 by now.

what do you mean by 'you're the 20bi move up type' btw?


well some practice more aggressive br management, and have become succesful at it, you might belong to that category, all im saying is that 15bi or less makes it a lot more risky, and you cant get a higher frequency of attempts if you run bad, which is really key to moving up and being succesful at it imo. honestly i dont even think itll take u a week to make another 250 from 25nl, just so that ur more on the safe side when taking ur 50nl shot. 10bi at 25nl is extremely easy and doable even in just one session. just take a little more time man all im saying really.good luck

 Last edit: 08/01/2009 12:24

Orome   Switzerland. Jan 08 2009 12:24. Posts 214

By learning enough on these limits do you mean poker skills themselves or more 'soft' skills like tilt control, handling downswings, etc.?

Because I believe I'm learning way more about poker on NL50 than on NL25.

Luckily I haven't hit that big downswing yet, I imagine it'll be pretty hard to handle, but yes, I will definitely move down if/when it happens.


Orome   Switzerland. Jan 08 2009 12:41. Posts 214


  On January 08 2009 11:21 whamm! wrote:
Show nested quote +



well some practice more aggressive br management, and have become succesful at it, you might belong to that category, all im saying is that 15bi or less makes it a lot more risky, and you cant get a higher frequency of attempts if you run bad, which is really key to moving up and being succesful at it imo. honestly i dont even think itll take u a week to make another 250 from 25nl, just so that ur more on the safe side when taking ur 50nl shot. 10bi at 25nl is extremely easy and doable even in just one session. just take a little more time man all im saying really.good luck



Thanks

I'm at over 800$ now so I have 16+ BI for NL50 and I don't think there's much point in going down again now when I'm almost properly rolled for NL50, but it'll definitely be the last 10 BI shot I'll take.


Orome   Switzerland. Jan 08 2009 13:46. Posts 214

lol I feel like you guys jinxed me with all your downswing talk and this is the beginning of the end




don't you love it when people 2 outer you, then try to tilt you by typing lol u suck in the chat?


 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap