1
|
Perisie   . Jan 26 2009 18:49. Posts 801 | | |
eh lol
shud it look like this - does it mean i really really suck or is this a legitimate uh unlucky run?
tnx...
|
|
|
1
|
Perisie   . Jan 26 2009 18:52. Posts 801 | | |
|
|
1
|
ReDDcaFFe   Bulgaria. Jan 26 2009 18:59. Posts 1172 | | |
You are loosing too much monay without show down.
Gotta steal way more pots.
|
|
I cant wait to take their money | |
|
|
1
|
d.Apollo   United Kingdom. Jan 26 2009 19:03. Posts 741 | | |
|
|
1
|
Bejamin1   Canada. Jan 26 2009 19:14. Posts 7042 | | |
If you're not beating micro limits over 35k hands for around 5pt/bb+ it's because your game isn't very good and you are doing things wrong. Players at these limits are far too exploitable for you to be breaking even against them if you aren't making tons of mistakes. |
|
Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
|
1
|
Perisie   . Jan 26 2009 19:44. Posts 801 | | |
i'm not really sure what kinds of things i might be doing wrong
i started off playing 6max trying to focus on making intelligent bluffs whilst playing what i thought to be the correct ranges, then over time decided "this isn't working"..."this isn't working"...."this isn't working"....and gradually filtered out everything until i was playing way fewer hands and in a manner that i thought seemed less spewy and risky. "intelligent bluffs" just didn't seem to be worthwhile - not one bit - since i was getting called down out of spite, out of curiosity, ruthlessly.... so i pretty much decided on a "no bluff" rule in a lot of spots and in most inflated pots. i also (6max still) stuck souly to the button, playing as tight as full ring anywhere else. it just wasn't worth playing looser coz i was getting called...called....called...it just didn't feel a profitable way to play
so, realising i was practically playing (pre flop) as if i was in full ring, i decided to switch to FR and get some more tables running. well, it seems to be working a bit better so far. but meh
really i don't know what to say. i've grinded from 5nl to 200nl before (years ago) and i'm 1000% certain i'm a much better player today, and much more stable. the results here don't actually worry me (to the point of annoying me), but ya
my friend said i should have been using a HUD so ive just installed gametime+. maybe this is a key aspect
more comments are welcomed ;] |
|
| Last edit: 26/01/2009 19:46 |
|
|
4
|
Baalim   Mexico. Jan 26 2009 19:52. Posts 34262 | | |
unlucky ruN? your equity is exactly as it should be, it means yo usuck |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
|
Perisie   . Jan 26 2009 19:57. Posts 801 | | |
i dunno how i can suck quite THAT much tho lol
was always told not to trust that part of the graph coz a bad run can also mean constantly shitty setups, or lack of setups |
|
|
1
|
Perisie   . Jan 26 2009 19:59. Posts 801 | | |
what can u say about my stats like vpip and aggros? its not like im spewy or whatever...im not sure WHAT the problem is , except people are saying "steal more pots" . cud it be that im folding too much when i have the best hand? etc |
|
|
1
|
ShadowDrgn   United States. Jan 26 2009 20:26. Posts 1156 | | |
I'm just learning too and you've played more hands than me, but I think my comments can be helpful.
First, 10.5/5.5 is fairly nitty. Even at full ring you should be raising at least twice as many hands as that and limping in more when you're getting good odds to do so.
Att. to steal blinds should definitely be more like 30-40%. Even if there's a fishy calling station or two in the blinds, you'll have position on them and be ahead of their range anyway.
WTSD is too low so you're definitely folding the best hand too often, which is crazy if you're only playing top 10% hands.
Playing without a HUD is definitely a huge problem with a lot of tables running.
Bluff the 20/15 TAGs. Don't bluff nits that only play monsters and don't bluff calling stations.
What do your positional stats and cbetting stats look like? |
|
|
1
|
Perisie   . Jan 26 2009 20:30. Posts 801 | | |
wow hang on this is interesting |
|
|
1
|
1
|
k2o4   United States. Jan 26 2009 20:46. Posts 4803 | | |
200NL years ago is pretty much was pretty much the same as NL25 now so don't let the fact that you were @ NL200 once make you think that you were playing at the level of NL200 today. |
|
|
|
1
|
YoMeR   United States. Jan 26 2009 21:22. Posts 12438 | | |
that poker EV graph confuses me a bit. where are the non-showdown winnings?
also what's your $ won when saw flop stat?
also: you're playing too tight on button/CO/hijack imo
actually you're prolly being a bit too nitty in general. you might want to loosen up your ranges: especially in position a bit. |
|
|
|
1
|
Perisie   . Jan 27 2009 02:13. Posts 801 | | |
non-showdown winnings are basically the green line minus the blue line, so imagine another very dark and evil line that dips far further than the green one
% won when saw flop.... isn't that what the last graph posted says? not sure sorry . better go now |
|
|
|