Time to run good?

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!

Forum Index > Poker Blogs

edzwoo United States. Jan 30 2009 06:24. Posts 5911

So after I've been tinkering around at NL100 for a bit, but it's been a bit frustrating. I'm certain I can beat the games the same rate I did at NL50, but I really believe I can actually beat it at an even higher rate than NL50. This sounds a bit strange because obviously the play should have improved, but regs here really suck in two spots: 3bet pots and getting raised at a certain point postflop. I don't really feel like getting into too much detail but basically everyone is a huge nit and refuses to get it in without the nuts, so just go all-in and they won't call.

Anyways, I think I have to fold AA and bottom sets often at this limit when I get raised, because the regs are seriously that nitty here. I think I might have stacked AK postflop ONCE and that was in a 3bet pot. Obviously I'm not playing the same as I did when I first came in because if everyone is that nitty... postflop should be something like size bets on flop and turn so that I have a PSB left on the river, then fire that last bullet and take down the pot 99% of the time.

Hand 14000 was when I dropped back down to NL50 and regrinded my roll back because I ran $1000 under expectation (lol sounds cool). If you notice the huge downswing when I peaked at around 500, that was rofl standard variance? I got set overset about 6 times, KK vs AA I dunno how many times, AA vs donk's two pairs some random amount of times.

It's kind of funny because I really do believe getting it in with bottom set in some spots is a LEAK at NL100.

0 votes

dogmeat Czech Republic. Jan 30 2009 07:14. Posts 6374

On January 30 2009 05:24 edzwoo wrote:
I'm certain I can beat the games the same rate I did at NL50, but I really believe I can actually beat it at an even higher rate than NL50.

you were running like 5ptbb/100 at nl50 right? LOL

ban baal

Mashe France. Jan 30 2009 07:59. Posts 604

Move to 6-max