1
| |
Is there any sense to try HU when I lose @ 9max and 6max?? (break even with bonuses).
Keep in mind I 24 table cause I'm bored with micro stakes and cannot focus. Probably I'm winner if ~4 tabling
Is HU any harder than the rest?
|
|
|
1
 |
edzwoo United States. Feb 08 2009 23:40. Posts 5911 | | |
HU is much harder to multitable because it's very read specific.
Right off the bat when I do more than 2 table heads up, I can tell my winrate is affected. |
|
| | Last edit: 08/02/2009 23:41 |
|
|
1
| |
That's why I want to do HU, cause it's not boring. It's not like 9max nit fest, waiting x hands to get playable hands. There is action all the time so I can focus on 1 table which i couldn't in 9max |
|
|
1
 |
phexac United States. Feb 09 2009 00:22. Posts 2563 | | |
| | On February 08 2009 22:38 nlloser60 wrote:
Is there any sense to try HU when I lose @ 9max and 6max?? (break even with bonuses).
Keep in mind I 24 table cause I'm bored with micro stakes and cannot focus. Probably I'm winner if ~4 tabling
Is HU any harder than the rest? |
Why don't you play 4-6 tables 6-max and win, get better, and move up. If you are 24-tabling and losing at micros, means you are playing like crap and should do something about it.
EDIT: AKA you won't solve your problems by switching games. |
|
| Nitting it up since 2006 | Last edit: 09/02/2009 00:23 |
|
|
1
 |
Fayth  Canada. Feb 09 2009 01:20. Posts 10085 | | |
if you have trouble with microstakes fullring and sh, I suggest you don't play HU |
|
| Im not sure what to do tomorrow when I see her, should I shake her hand?? -Floofy | |
|
|
1
 |
ZenMagick United States. Feb 09 2009 11:12. Posts 36 | | |
instead of being bored with microstakes playing 4 tables... focus on getting reads and taking notes. IF you do that your winrate and skill will go through the roof. I cant even imagine playing 24 tables, im instantly on autopilot at 12. I dont see how you could have a decent winrate with that many.. you would basically be grinding rakeback. |
|
|
1
| |
| | On February 09 2009 00:20 Fayth wrote:
if you have trouble with microstakes fullring and sh, I suggest you don't play HU |
|
|
|
1
 |
LightinG Poland. Feb 09 2009 12:55. Posts 234 | | |
| | On February 09 2009 00:20 Fayth wrote:
if you have trouble with microstakes fullring and sh, I suggest you don't play HU |
Play and donate. |
|
| If you build 1000 bridges and suck one cock, you are not a bridge builder. You are a cock sucker. | |
|
|
1
 |
MilZo France. Feb 09 2009 13:50. Posts 1333 | | |
| | On February 08 2009 23:22 phexac wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 08 2009 22:38 nlloser60 wrote:
Is there any sense to try HU when I lose @ 9max and 6max?? (break even with bonuses).
Keep in mind I 24 table cause I'm bored with micro stakes and cannot focus. Probably I'm winner if ~4 tabling
Is HU any harder than the rest? |
Why don't you play 4-6 tables 6-max and win, get better, and move up. If you are 24-tabling and losing at micros, means you are playing like crap and should do something about it.
EDIT: AKA you won't solve your problems by switching games.
|
This. |
|
| S1KLYF, this is the profession we chose | |
|
|
1
| |
| | On February 09 2009 11:55 LightinG wrote:
Play and donate. |
Yeah, thats what I'm doing  . |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 579 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 05:35
