1
 |
attik34 United States. Mar 02 2009 04:48. Posts 92 | | |
So, right now I'm micro grinding, and I was wondering what the best site is as far as rake not being retarded. I want it to be something i can get rakeback....and i was gonna go to FTP when i got to NL25 but appearently they janked up their rake system to where it wouldnt be worth the effort to switch...
Just curious as to what sites have the lowest rake at micro stakes/all stakes, and have decent rakeback....cuz stars' rakeback=nothing so suck it...lol
|
| |
|
|
1
 |
Uptown . Mar 02 2009 04:54. Posts 3557 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
 |
TheGuru Sweden. Mar 02 2009 05:09. Posts 532 | | |
low rake > rakeback so STARS at microstake
FT is ok on 25 nl? I think they charge a lot on 10 NL but standard 5% with 1$ max on 25NL. |
|
| There is no such thing as luck. There is only adequate or inadequate preparation to cope with a statistical universe. - Robert A. Heinlein (Time Enough for Love) | |
|
|
1
 |
P1mpdaddy Austria. Mar 02 2009 05:18. Posts 1370 | | |
| | On March 02 2009 03:54 Uptown wrote:
stars till you hit nl50?
|
Thats somehow funny cos I would have said the exact opposite.
The VPP - paid rake ratio is ridiculous on stars till you hit NL50.
I would suggest ipoker. But make sure you choose the right skin because all skins differ in the rewarding system (or better said how easy it is to get poins (which is especially important for micro stakes) which you later can swap to money = cashback)
|
| |
|
|
1
|
Uptown . Mar 02 2009 05:47. Posts 3557 | | |
ah yea I was really only considering Stars vs FTP sry  |
| |
|
|
1
 |
ThuNDeR Bulgaria. Mar 02 2009 06:11. Posts 371 | | |
IPN for microstakess fo sho.
They also usually power you up to the highest VIP level so you get max rakeback at the beginning. |
| |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 924 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 13:44
