|
|
 |
March and thoughts |
 |
1
 |
edzwoo United States. Mar 31 2009 22:26. Posts 5911 | | |
Started off March 24 tabling NL50 because I had no confidence in my game. Played about 6k hands and was playing and running bad. I stopped playing for a bit, watched some DeucesCracked videos, bought my new monitor and then started back up 12 tabling the new 50bb fast tables.
I was playing better but was running hot. Went back to NL100 and absolutely crushed it. Played some NL200, ran bad again but only dropped a few buyins. I barely played this month (27k hands but half was donking around NL50 mass multitabling).
I cashed out a total of $2800, when my roll was around $5000 with the intention of depositing it on other sites but that never happened and I never ended up redepositing LOL.
Right now I'm not sure whether to take aggro shots at NL200 or to stay at NL100 for a bit. I've taken 2 shots, first shot I got variance'd hard for -5bi, second shot I went up 3bi in 2k hands, but got variance'd again and dropped -3bi over a bit. I originally thought there was nearly no difference in the amount of fish, but if you table select carefully, you realize there is nearly twice as many fish at NL100 than there is at NL200. I'm not sure but after discovering my super secret formula to destroying everyone at NL100 (as mentioned in previous a previous blogpost), I THINK my true win rate at NL100 is bigger than 5ptbb/100. Oh and don't go flying back to expect to see some crazy insightful post because I pretty much just said, "play better" and isolate the fish more often.
Poll: What should edzwoo do?
(Vote): NL100 is good money, stay there for a while and cashout occasionally.
(Vote): Take aggressive shots at NL200 around 20-25bi
(Vote): Take shots at NL200 25+ bi
I don't want to start cashing out again until I've made a decision that I'm staying at a limit where I am most profitable. I am very good about taking a shot and moving down if running bad, so tilting my roll is not an issue. Another thing is for a college student like myself, beating NL100 at a strong rate is VERY, VERY good money. In fact, I could probably live off of it. Of course, if I'm only keeping myself to a certain limit, it's not nearly as +EV in the long run if I had the potential to be making more.
Some other thoughts I've been having is starting up a poker club here at UIUC and educate some fish to beat NL5 or something. I'm actually shocked that there isn't one, so it leads me to believe there is some rule against it, but I'll find out. If this goes through, I'll probably be posting stuff related to it on LP to get feedback from you guys.
Anyways, here are some graphs:
March all hands
March NL100- gold mine
Numbers
Bonus pity graph- lifetime 80k hands -21bi ev at NL100
Anyways, good luck at the tables.
|
|
| | Last edit: 31/03/2009 22:35 |
|
| 1
 |
whamm! Albania. Mar 31 2009 22:43. Posts 11625 | | |
when in doubt. play 100nl. when u feel fearless or are in a mood similar to that, take 1k hand shots at 200nl esp during weekends |
|
| 1
 |
Fox . Mar 31 2009 22:53. Posts 3110 | | |
what you should do is play more hands. like 50k and then take your NL200 shot.
you could take an agressive shot at NL200 that's what i did in march and i ran at about 5bb/100. |
|
| 1
 |
kaisr Canada. Mar 31 2009 23:12. Posts 1058 | | |
what happened to your redline? you used to have the sickest low stakes FR redline, but i guess a non-negative red-line in NL100 FR is already pretty sick? |
|
| 1
|
edzwoo United States. Mar 31 2009 23:41. Posts 5911 | | |
Sacrificed some red line to make blue line LOL |
|
| 1
|
Sicks Macks United States. Mar 31 2009 23:59. Posts 3929 | | |
OMG -21 bi in EV. I think I would have shot someone by now. |
| |
|
| 1
|
joLin United States. Apr 01 2009 00:06. Posts 3818 | | | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
 Poker Streams | |
|
Contact Users: 1102 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 09:15
