What do I need to change?

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!

Forum Index > Poker Blogs

kyd . Apr 16 2009 17:59. Posts 289

Hi.
There are some crazy people who actually help and give an insight based on stats and graphs.. so ;-) y not, I gotta try
I used to lurk on liquidpoker for very long time, also I'm posting activly on polish "little brother"

I came back to cash games after winning a donkament.. ;-)

My bankroll is 1350$, I wonder if I should get back to NL25 to grind out to like 1500$ ?
This graph is from nl25 and nl50... samples are not that huge but im wondering why the hell my graph looks like rollercoaster and my redline is fucking sick...

and my stats

What more do you guys need? I will post it tomorrow.

Thanks for any input.

0 votes

genjix China. Apr 16 2009 18:09. Posts 2677

ur bluffing too much.

edit: ridiculously small sample size. come back 27k hands later

If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.

Last edit: 16/04/2009 18:10

terrybunny19240 United States. Apr 16 2009 18:37. Posts 13829

u play like a monkey

sample size is small but that is still obvious

kyd . Apr 16 2009 18:42. Posts 289

ok
i play like monkey

so what do i do wrong except i do it all wrong?
;-)

constructive

rockman255 Canada. Apr 16 2009 18:49. Posts 4471

just a wild guess, but you should consider the call option instead of the raise option when you are in position more often. you can maintain control of hands in position and usually get a lot of value anyway, and a lot of times you can get a lot more money than your "flop %" and stuff work out to. forcing action in position is usually a mistake. and i bet you're doing it. :o

rockman255: its not easy being superman U N0 MySteeZ: mega man. rockman255: same thing U N0 MySteeZ: no

Last edit: 16/04/2009 18:50

lazymej Canada. Apr 16 2009 18:59. Posts 2897

looks like you're set on some kind of laggrotard style. Of course this can be very profitable in several situations, but you need to be able to change gears depending on the types of opponents at you're table as there is never one clear cookie-cut method of doing things indefinitely. But it seems to be working for you decently so far, but the sample size is far too small to draw any solid conclusions from.

failsafe United States. Apr 16 2009 19:35. Posts 1040

haha if you and i could have children we would be raping NL5k. my situation is just the opposite of yours except for the breakeven part. i do that pretty well

longple

Sweden. Apr 16 2009 19:44. Posts 4472

they all said it, try play more IP and for value, all ur winnings are from none showdowns it looks like, and i guess not trying to win every pot

if ppl fold alot, go ahead take the pots til they show you they got the nuts
if they dont fold, dont try to bet them off hands, destroy them with ur big hands instead

simple rule of thumb : )

and CB less, 80% is kinda alot