1
|
kyd   . May 08 2009 12:12. Posts 289 | | |
is there anyone who plays them fulltime?
I mean, turbo sitngos are like nobrainers.. while 45 man sitngos might be just as well just smaller tournaments?
so, "more skill" is involved?
prove me wrong~
|
|
|
1
|
Ket   United Kingdom. May 08 2009 12:45. Posts 8665 | | |
more blinds more play more skill |
|
| Last edit: 08/05/2009 12:45 |
|
|
1
|
kyd   . May 08 2009 13:12. Posts 289 | | |
so I should be able to achieve better ROI over good samples right?
What would be a good 45man non-turbo ROI? ;-)
also, stars are the best for these tournaments, right? |
|
|
1
|
kaisr   Canada. May 08 2009 13:13. Posts 1058 | | |
Yeh, you're ROI should be better with non-turbos but significantly fewer of them run at a time so you're definitely better off like massively multitabling turbos because very few people play non turbos |
|
|
1
|
kaisr   Canada. May 08 2009 13:13. Posts 1058 | | |
And they also take like 1.5x as long as non turbos which means your ROI in them has to be 1.5x as much for them to be worth the same
and if you play NL50 i doubt there are any non turbo sngs that would be worth your time |
|
| Last edit: 08/05/2009 13:16 |
|
|
1
|
Achoo   Canada. May 08 2009 13:22. Posts 1454 | | |
Turbos are a push fest and ud better be good at flipping |
|
Odds are exactly 50%: it either happens or not | |
|
|
0
|
2Vi3T_B0Y4   Canada. May 08 2009 13:38. Posts 927 | | |
i play fulltime, sng turbo 6handed or 45ppl on ps only. cuz sng nonturbo sux . |
|
|
1
|
TwistedEcho   United Kingdom. May 08 2009 14:06. Posts 3539 | | |
ppl who say turbos are no skill are usually fish who suck
while you'll get a better roi at none turbos, its almost certain you'll have a lower $/hr, which isn't what you want |
|
|
|
|