heads up sngs

yep they they teach you alot.
Most important is to adabt vs players ... what i didnt like vs agressive players i didnt like to coinflip in hu.. i know i am ahead but in coinflips everything can happen. Like i lost 3 hus getting in best while oponent was dominated and they catched 3 outer each time. I like to have good streaks in hu sngs like 8 wins in row etc. but main is to get edge and play little defencive hyper agressive people.

its a grind. Just like everything else poker. one of the biggest winners, skilled_sox has only 28$ profit pr sng while playing up to 5600$ ones.

ye it will take u a couple of million hours gl -.-

No offense, but what you just said that out of 25 sngs, your only up 1 BI?

Thats quite bad... you should be up anywhere from $55-95

On May 25 2009 09:46 MayZerG wrote: No offense, but what you just said that out of 25 sngs, your only up 1 BI? Thats quite bad... you should be up anywhere from $55-95

WAT

u do realise that if he won every single one of them hed be up only 120ish?

lol mayzerg thats kinda silly

if u guys really think one buyin/25 matches is good, u are greatly mistaken.

On May 25 2009 10:19 SfydjkLm wrote: u do realise that if he won every single one of them hed be up only 120ish?

likewise if he won 50% he should be up 60. however hes only up 6. need i say more?

On May 25 2009 13:17 shaneomac wrote: Show nested quote + On May 25 2009 10:19 SfydjkLm wrote: u do realise that if he won every single one of them hed be up only 120ish? likewise if he won 50% he should be up 60. however hes only up 6. need i say more?

Agreed that why i said $55+

On May 25 2009 09:46 MayZerG wrote: No offense, but what you just said that out of 25 sngs, your only up 1 BI? Thats quite bad... you should be up anywhere from $55-95

Correct. But sample size is lol. Play 200 more and you'll get the idea.

THANKYOU Shaneomac + anheway

Everyone else replying is fucking stupid if they think only up 1 BI out of 25 games is good LOLOLOL.

wat? IF u win 50% you are down due to rake? AM I not getting sth...?

lol 25 aint shit and i went on a pretty bad run hence y i only played 25 sngs i eventually played 50 more alittle later and won about $120ish

jengsum, just so you get the idea of 'averages': solid winners (lower stakes) are happy with 10-15% ROI which is around 60% (don't forget the rake) games won. 75% won means sodomizing without lubricator and only the best could do it over decent sample size.

well i am currently winning about 50-60% according to my hm still aint doing too bad considering i lost like 11 in a row alittle earlier which idk how it is with u ppl but thats a pretty bad run for me thats only happen 3 times before...

On May 25 2009 14:08 nixxxbg wrote: wat? IF u win 50% you are down due to rake? AM I not getting sth...?

yeah that's what i thought too
say we play 2 games. we lose one, we lose one BI. we win one, we win one BI. so we come out breakeven minus the rake we pay
is this not right?

On May 25 2009 13:21 MayZerG wrote: THANKYOU Shaneomac + anheway Everyone else replying is fucking stupid if they think only up 1 BI out of 25 games is good LOLOLOL.

Who said this? or even implied it.... I think its "pretty fucking stupid" to think out of any 25 game stretch everyone should win 10 buyins minimum. He never said it was a amazing soul ownage session where he destroyed everyone, He says he just started out playing HU sngs and made a profit nuf sed. Im not sure why you feel you have to come in here and tell him how bad he did in a small sample size it doesn't really help anyone and just makes you look like a dick.