1
| | |
|
| | Last edit: 05/05/2010 13:50 |
|
|
1
| |
Hand no.5 is a case where if he's actually floating two streets with a naked flush draw all he could really have is AQss or MAYBE AJss so it's such a small range. |
|
|
0
 |
lvcjarrett United States. Aug 19 2009 19:37. Posts 100 | | |
Welcome  |
|
|
1
 |
acdawg712 United States. Aug 19 2009 20:50. Posts 2639 | | |
btw epinerine9 or whatever is semper on lp i believe. I don't like ur call in hand number 1. No need to call off such random overshoves. People never bet there with a hand you beat. Even when terrible players bet like that, they have a full house. |
|
| phil hellmuth is genuinely a stupid person and he does not understand poker very well at all - [vital]myth | |
|
|
1
| |
Acedawg:
Yeah, my call in hand no.1 was absolute horrible shit. That's why I posted it. 
And cool, didn't know that. I'll watch out for him later on then. |
|
|
1
| |
Since I said regular touristy type guy, I guess I was wrong too. Had just a few hands on him where I thought he'd been playing touristy. |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 803 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 03:17
