Stars 3/6....

i just play 50bb tables and so should all the regs, dunno why they still open regular tables.

ive been hearing this a lot about 2/4
very depressing

it trickles down to every stake

the only reason you got to play a normal table is if there is a really big fish there, and if thats the case sure the ss can fuck up ur isos but still you can make money and otherwise just ban normal tables, i am so pissed when i see regs starting non 50 bb tables arghrh

On September 26 2009 16:35 EvilSky wrote: i just play 50bb tables and so should all the regs, dunno why they still open regular tables.

yeah I just filter the lobby to only 50bb and have more than enough tables most of the time

people really cant complain about playing with ssers anymore because they shouldnt be playin non 50bb tables

Games overall have become much more annoying. Light 4bets are now standard for NL100 when like 6 months ago very few people were doing it. And even @ NL100 / NL200 the # of shortstackers has grown like crazy. It's funny cause whenever I play NL100 I see lots of NL200 regs. Too many video sites and not enough new fish =(

www.pokerstrategy.com

sss = free money

short stackers are mostly randoms who are playing for fun, so its typically easy money and its a lot of newcomers to the game, this should be good news

maybe become a shortstacker urself? be on in the gaaaang yo!!!


[ ] serious

On September 26 2009 18:14 k2o4 wrote: Games overall have become much more annoying. Light 4bets are now standard for NL100 when like 6 months ago very few people were doing it. And even @ NL100 / NL200 the # of shortstackers has grown like crazy. It's funny cause whenever I play NL100 I see lots of NL200 regs. Too many video sites and not enough new fish =(

I agree that 200NL regs playing 100NL and regs moving down a bit like that is bad news but people applying new concepts to lower stakes isn't necessarily bad. Even people at 20NL or whatever stake think they should 4-bet light nowadays but at 20NL but even at 100NL or whatever, that doesn't mean they are doing it right... at all. Normally they completely misapply any of the more advance concepts and actually just makes them spew so sometimes it's even much better than them being nitty because misapplying stuff like this makes it possible for them to make mistakes.

On September 26 2009 19:49 chris wrote: short stackers are mostly randoms who are playing for fun, so its typically easy money and its a lot of newcomers to the game, this should be good news

this is not the reality that i have seen, id say 1/20 shortstackers is someone playing for fun, unless they are having mad fun by being a tight nit and shoving over raises.