What a dumbass

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!

Forum Index > Poker Blogs

Craigerson United States. Nov 02 2009 22:16. Posts 1281

a couple hours after my post about the bad beat jackpot i get a PM from NeillyJQ saying:

i have my online mtt action covered on stars, live action covered by local pro and friend, and looking for online action covered on Cake Poker. Looking for $1500-$2000, play until $12,000 (1-3 month investment) (terms negotiable)

Chop goes 7k to you 5k me at end after investment or however we negotiate. Make-up is loan makeup- which means if i lose it i pay back 50% of your investment when I have a 15k bankroll. (in essence your covering 50% my buy-in)

If you cant and know someone who can forward me to them.

I have all my PT3 since moving back from vegas you can see at any time.

You can always watch me play via teamviewer / skype if you can help me or know someone who can. im selling all my action prolly til 2010 unless something magical happens.

Lemme know,
Ryan

what the fuck is wrong with this guy? i'm cool with him posting on his own blog about needing a stake and all but really? asking a guy you've never talked to once in your life? this is like the most retarded PM i've ever received. who the fuck wants to give 1.5k to a kid that has no credibility with me?

0 votes

fenner Australia. Nov 02 2009 22:20. Posts 2188

he sent to me too, kinda lame since he couldve just blogged but whatever

superfashion United States. Nov 02 2009 22:21. Posts 918

That's pretty brutal. I didn't get one, but I guess being a no-name micro player has its perks :D

shoving here as a bluff at 50NL is like explaning calcalus to a 6 month old cat wtf are you thinking - TalentedTom

Craigerson United States. Nov 02 2009 22:23. Posts 1281

anybody who gives out random PMs for a stake is scum

Last edit: 02/11/2009 22:24

djforever Canada. Nov 02 2009 22:24. Posts 1510

i got one too. not sure what the problem is. if you dont want to do it just tell him no.

4TM United States. Nov 02 2009 22:26. Posts 712

Ya it's kind of a douche move but I think scum is a little harsh

Motiva United States. Nov 02 2009 23:07. Posts 104

eh, I think it's a bit aggressive, but I really don't see any problem with it..

I mean all bias' aside he's just trying to sell an investment prospect to you... I don't see why it's necessary to call names.

Either take him seriously and look at what he has to offer or ignore him.

Last edit: 02/11/2009 23:10

egood United States. Nov 02 2009 23:22. Posts 1883

I thought neilly was robusto, what happened?

Maynard! United States. Nov 02 2009 23:59. Posts 4453

On November 02 2009 22:07 Motiva wrote:
eh, I think it's a bit aggressive, but I really don't see any problem with it..

I mean all bias' aside he's just trying to sell an investment prospect to you... I don't see why it's necessary to call names.

Either take him seriously and look at what he has to offer or ignore him.

.

Now I really am a busto. Thanks FTP.

[sK] United States. Nov 03 2009 00:20. Posts 174

i think his approach is definitely aggressive. but really, there's no need to react so negatively imo.

Ket

United Kingdom. Nov 03 2009 00:58. Posts 8665

i guess if you arent a real part of the general professional gambling scene you arent used to the concept that staking and investing some of your own profits on other players is pretty standard and normal. op probably sees staking as something thats only done for good friends as a favour. if you think this then sure youd think its out of line for a random to be approaching you and asking. but in reality there are very few favours done between players in the poker world, but there is still a lot of staking done. why? mutual benefit. for a true fulltime gambler their money will always be in some sort of action. op and neilly are just part of different worlds

terrybunny19240 United States. Nov 03 2009 01:26. Posts 13829

lol solid post ket, agree

Craigerson United States. Nov 03 2009 01:39. Posts 1281

from the way you put it ket~ you just made me look like a complete asshole

thanks for the heads up though, makes more sense now