1
 |
phexac United States. Dec 02 2009 05:26. Posts 2563 | | |
So here's my graph over past 100k hands. This is mostly 8-tabling NL200. Not pictured is about 5k hands at NL400 and NL600 for about 2k as well as the fact that I am 25BI under EV on FTP while exactly on EV on Stars (rigged?). You can see the evidence of FTP fun in the recurring 2k-3k downswings. Some extra cash from live play and rakeback make the past 100k hands rather nice. Goal for December is to play at least 4 hours on the days that I do play. My winrate has been a steady 3BB-6BB/100 on month to month basis so, in theory, playing more hands should yield more profits, but you never know.
One way I have found for putting in more hands is playing live. For some reason, my subconscious puts live play and online play into 2 different categories, so when I am done with live play for the day and feel that I really don't want to play any more, I can go to the local casino and have a fresh start. Live play itself is also far less tiring than online. As such, I have found it a nice way to increase my monthly winnings without wearing myself out.
|
| |
|
|
1
|
lazymej Canada. Dec 02 2009 06:47. Posts 2897 | | |
nice winrate for 8 tabling. |
|
|
1
 |
ToT)MidiaN(  United Kingdom. Dec 02 2009 06:56. Posts 5070 | | |
Grats. Funny how many people run so far below EV on FTP. I'm down like $20k lifetime on FTP whereas EV shows I "should" be up $20k -_- and on Stars I run very close to EV too, slightly above infact. |
|
| One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope | |
|
|
1
|
phexac United States. Dec 02 2009 08:05. Posts 2563 | | |
| | On December 02 2009 05:56 ToT)MidiaN( wrote:
Grats. Funny how many people run so far below EV on FTP. I'm down like $20k lifetime on FTP whereas EV shows I "should" be up $20k -_- and on Stars I run very close to EV too, slightly above infact. |
I know exactly what you mean. There have been days where I felt like quitting FTP for good despite the fact that it seems so much softer than Stars... But it only takes a look at a table with 2 double-stacked fish, and I come back for more  |
|
| Nitting it up since 2006 | Last edit: 02/12/2009 08:06 |
|
|
1
| |
I've never had any success on ftp for longer than 10k stretches either come to think of it, lawl.. this is their last month to keep me around!
nice graph too |
|
|
1
|
ToT)MidiaN( United Kingdom. Dec 02 2009 09:57. Posts 5070 | | |
| | On December 02 2009 07:05 phexac wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2009 05:56 ToT)MidiaN( wrote:
Grats. Funny how many people run so far below EV on FTP. I'm down like $20k lifetime on FTP whereas EV shows I "should" be up $20k -_- and on Stars I run very close to EV too, slightly above infact. |
I know exactly what you mean. There have been days where I felt like quitting FTP for good despite the fact that it seems so much softer than Stars... But it only takes a look at a table with 2 double-stacked fish, and I come back for more
|
Totally agree that the tables LOOK a lot softer. That's why I kept coming back, it feels like the regs are worse than on stars and there's a whole lot more fish, which makes sense really because a lot of the big named pros play at FTP which prob attracts a lot of donkeys, but I just can't win there. Obviously I don't actually believe that FTP is rigged, other people have success at FTP and not at other sites and claim that other sites are rigged, people say Stars is rigged etc, but it's strange that a lot of players who win at multiple sites seem to do poorer at FTP. Bleh.
I'm pretty sure there was a thread on here over a year ago where leatherass emailed FTP with a serious complaint that their software is rigged, saying that he was winning at more than 3ptbb/100 at Stars over large samples, but losing at FTP over a similar large sample. May have been someone else, pretty sure I'm not dreaming that up though. |
|
| One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope | |
|
|
1
|
phexac United States. Dec 02 2009 10:02. Posts 2563 | | |
Yeah I don't really think FTP is rigged, but the whole thing with different winrates on different sites is funny. I still win there, but my winrate is lower than on stars. Granted, I only started playing there in May, so my sample is relatively small, but I still THINK I should win more there  |
| |
|
|
1
|
LikeASet United States. Dec 02 2009 10:21. Posts 2113 | | |
What's you're average tabling for this long term run? |
|
|
1
|
phexac United States. Dec 02 2009 10:34. Posts 2563 | | |
| | On December 02 2009 09:21 LikeASet wrote:
What's you're average tabling for this long term run? |
8-table |
| |
|
|
1
| |
| | On December 02 2009 08:57 ToT)MidiaN( wrote:
I'm pretty sure there was a thread on here over a year ago where leatherass emailed FTP with a serious complaint that their software is rigged, saying that he was winning at more than 3ptbb/100 at Stars over large samples, but losing at FTP over a similar large sample. May have been someone else, pretty sure I'm not dreaming that up though. |
haha really? I'd really like to see this |
|
|
1
 |
YoMeR United States. Dec 02 2009 11:39. Posts 12438 | | |
statistical anomalies suck ass. cept when it swings up more than it should. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
ortak Bulgaria. Dec 02 2009 13:11. Posts 83 | | | |
|
|
1
 |
k2o4 United States. Dec 02 2009 13:18. Posts 4803 | | |
nice results, way to go man.
how long did it take to play the 100k hands? |
| |
|
|
1
|
phexac United States. Dec 02 2009 14:10. Posts 2563 | | |
| | On December 02 2009 12:18 k2o4 wrote:
nice results, way to go man.
how long did it take to play the 100k hands? |
About 2 months |
| |
|
|
1
|
Exhilarate United States. Dec 02 2009 16:50. Posts 5453 | | |
nice job man. whats ur stars id btw if you dont mind me asking? |
|
|
1
 |
Sanity United States. Dec 02 2009 17:24. Posts 1076 | | | |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 1026 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 07:03
