rush poker is rigged

my graph goes up 22 bi then down to +4? then i cash out everything and hate ftp as if nothing ever happened

you hate rushpoker and blame it for being rigged because of all of this happens in just a couple of thousand hands, what normally happens in couple of Ten-thousand hands....
get use to it that the variance is speed-killing.

My rushpoker experience is the same LOL

i was surprised i didnt bust at rush with just over 125usd (from semper), ran it up to 250 then decided to try plo 1/2 meh topset aaa on rainbow super ultra dry board 3bet pot
conclusion: ftp is really rigged

On January 25 2010 06:38 env0y_nl wrote: you hate rushpoker and blame it for being rigged because of all of this happens in just a couple of thousand hands, what normally happens in couple of Ten-thousand hands.... get use to it that the variance is speed-killing.

But why would the number of flopped sets/sets in general increase so much over a small sample of hands just because you're moving from table to table every hand.

On January 25 2010 11:03 hoylemj wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2010 06:38 env0y_nl wrote: you hate rushpoker and blame it for being rigged because of all of this happens in just a couple of thousand hands, what normally happens in couple of Ten-thousand hands.... get use to it that the variance is speed-killing. But why would the number of flopped sets/sets in general increase so much over a small sample of hands just because you're moving from table to table every hand.

i noticed i won some pots kinda next to eachother with flopping a set yes, but i think its just variance

better question is, why would full tilt increase the number of flopped set in rush poker? it could be to create more rake, because of shipping money more faster between users.
but personally, i dont believe that, how would they do that technically in the first place.
some times you dont flop a set for 15/20 pairs long, sometimes you flop a set every 2/3 pairs you got. thats just variance. and in rush poker its more noticeable.

On January 25 2010 12:44 env0y_nl wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2010 11:03 hoylemj wrote:   On January 25 2010 06:38 env0y_nl wrote: you hate rushpoker and blame it for being rigged because of all of this happens in just a couple of thousand hands, what normally happens in couple of Ten-thousand hands.... get use to it that the variance is speed-killing. But why would the number of flopped sets/sets in general increase so much over a small sample of hands just because you're moving from table to table every hand. i noticed i won some pots kinda next to eachother with flopping a set yes, but i think its just variance better question is, why would full tilt increase the number of flopped set in rush poker? it could be to create more rake, because of shipping money more faster between users. but personally, i dont believe that, how would they do that technically in the first place. some times you dont flop a set for 15/20 pairs long, sometimes you flop a set every 2/3 pairs you got. thats just variance. and in rush poker its more noticeable.

Yeah, I think it's just variance

it's a game of coolers. no surprise here