Table Selection?

One habit that i have is that i constantly try to determine if a player is a winner or loser either using ptr on another screen or by observation at the table and i label winners breakevens and losers with different colours. That way when im searching for tables i can easily identify which tables will be most profitable by looking for the most amount of losing players that ive already searched for. This is only really feasible playing like <8 tables though and if u are constantly marking players as u encounter new players.

I play on euro site (betclic, boss media)
So I know all reg , and quit if there isn't a fish. (I play nl 100 to 200 )
3 reg without a fish you have to quit

what this is for 6max? I usually count a table as good if it's four regs and one fish not close to my left

kbis you label them with a table selection program?

i just sit/waitlist any table with a non fullstack ;
if game is bad, then i quit

nono, i colour code players using ftp gui, green = losing player, red = winning, purple = breakeven. I then look for tables with highest plyrs/flop then look through all full tables and waitlist on tables with 2 greens or more.

edit: i play 6max where this alot more feasible than FR

waitlist 25%< with 2>ppl waiting. No point waiting listing longer waitlists because table will be totally different by the time you sit.

Does anyone select by $/pot?

i do. that's all i have to go on. obv stats aren't that reliable, pretty sure if there's an all in $/pot prob inflates

but at your lvl usually 1 fish per table
how much more do u need?