0
|
hiems   United States. May 13 2010 22:11. Posts 2979 | | |
|
I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] | Last edit: 13/05/2010 22:14 |
|
|
1
|
vlseph   United States. May 13 2010 22:15. Posts 3026 | | |
why are all small stakes players obsessed with being "LAG?"
just play like a nit and get money. Also you're playing really terrible hands i dont know what you're expecting from playing them, you pretty much have to flop like a god to get money or have to run big bluffs with very little equity. |
|
The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts. | |
|
|
1
|
joLin   United States. May 13 2010 22:17. Posts 3818 | | |
| On May 13 2010 21:15 vlseph wrote:
why are all small stakes players obsessed with being "LAG?"
just play like a nit and get money. Also you're playing really terrible hands i dont know what you're expecting from playing them, you pretty much have to flop like a god to get money or have to run big bluffs with very little equity. |
this.
why is everyone obsessed with making their vpip as big as possible instead of making their bb/100 as big as possible? |
|
|
|
1
|
joLin   United States. May 13 2010 22:17. Posts 3818 | | |
|
|
|
1
|
joLin   United States. May 13 2010 22:19. Posts 3818 | | |
| On May 13 2010 21:11 hiems wrote:
I think the general lesson from the 93cc hand and the 73o hand is that I have to think harder about bluff shoves on polarized spots more. |
lol no. the general lesson to be learned here is to stop being spewy. |
|
|
|
0
|
hiems   United States. May 13 2010 22:21. Posts 2979 | | |
|
I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] | |
|
|
0
|
hiems   United States. May 13 2010 22:21. Posts 2979 | | |
But if I raise 73o preflop, it only makes sense to be willing to shove this river right? Or else fold pre? |
|
I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] | |
|
|
0
|
hiems   United States. May 13 2010 22:25. Posts 2979 | | |
Oh by the way Gdanik was really nitty from what I remember. |
|
I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] | |
|
|
1
|
Zalfor   United States. May 13 2010 22:30. Posts 2236 | | |
3betting 73o is ... you know.
|
|
|
1
|
vlseph   United States. May 13 2010 22:35. Posts 3026 | | |
| On May 13 2010 21:21 hiems wrote:
But if I raise 73o preflop, it only makes sense to be willing to shove this river right? Or else fold pre? |
only if he folds, know when to give up |
|
The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts. | |
|
|
0
|
hiems   United States. May 13 2010 22:37. Posts 2979 | | |
| On May 13 2010 21:35 vlseph wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2010 21:21 hiems wrote:
But if I raise 73o preflop, it only makes sense to be willing to shove this river right? Or else fold pre? |
only if he folds, know when to give up
|
Yeah. I was thinking similar thoughts prior to the 73o shove actually. |
|
I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] | |
|
|
1
|
joLin   United States. May 13 2010 22:38. Posts 3818 | | |
| On May 13 2010 21:37 hiems wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2010 21:35 vlseph wrote:
| On May 13 2010 21:21 hiems wrote:
But if I raise 73o preflop, it only makes sense to be willing to shove this river right? Or else fold pre? |
only if he folds, know when to give up
|
Yeah. I was thinking similar thoughts prior to the 73o shove actually. |
the "when to give up" here is preflop. |
|
|
|
0
|
hiems   United States. May 13 2010 22:39. Posts 2979 | | |
| On May 13 2010 21:30 Zalfor wrote:
3betting 73o is ... you know.
|
I guess the problem is I don't know. (I guess underestimating how much worse it is than say, Q5s or whatever).
|
|
I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] | |
|
|
1
|
DaTruf   United States. May 13 2010 22:45. Posts 398 | | |
|
|
1
|
Mariuslol   Norway. May 13 2010 23:16. Posts 4742 | | |
aiai, all hands grossly missplayed. And lol, if you're playing 10nl, play hands with good equity, and cut down so you get a really tight range oop :x
Play High cards (especially vs short stacks and bad ppl for value) call multi way vs nits/tight ppl with suited connectors, or limp with them if u can cos they play sick good multiway, and some connected cards, fold everything else, easier to play, make less mistakes and get in less tricky spots, and you can learn it the right way.
This is nonsense |
|
|
1
|
Fayth   Canada. May 13 2010 23:24. Posts 10085 | | |
not sure what you expect to get called from in hand 1, AJ ? you'd rather check/call or check/fold river, you can also check turn and bet like half pot river if he checks behind turn
73o is a fold no matter how lag you are, even durrrr or isildur wouldn't even think about playing it
as for the 93s, cutoff raise might be a bit too loose, raising it from the button would be fine otherwise, now that u raised it, u can just comfortably call flop considering he's betting 30 cents into 90 cents, calling is just fine... now if u decide to raise, you're in position so you can check behind turn to get a free card once it's checked to you
You must not feel bad about giving up even when you've been bluffing on flop + turn or w/e it is that u did |
|
Im not sure what to do tomorrow when I see her, should I shake her hand?? -Floofy | |
|
|
1
|
Eluflop   Estonia. May 14 2010 00:26. Posts 3835 | | |
why ... why do you do this to yourself |
|
|
1
|
Acckerman   United States. May 14 2010 00:55. Posts 725 | | |
| On May 13 2010 23:26 Eluflop wrote:
why ... why do you do this to yourself |
coz apparently nit is a derogatory term nowadays |
|
|
0
|
hiems   United States. May 14 2010 01:31. Posts 2979 | | |
Hm cool. Checking the 93 in position didnt even occur to me actually...Im just so used to semi-bluffing with flush draws that I did'nt really consider the checking alternative. The way I thought about checking was that its usually 0 EV (I guess?) or 0% share of equity since I just auto-associated it with hands where the option to check comes up at showdown or with a hand with little equity. But it never occured to me that checking a FD in position actually can be really profitable since your just guaranteeing urself a draw. didnt think about just calling the flop either.
And yeah the QQ river decision I feel is probably the worst decision of the bunch in terms of my thought process. 73o at least the reason why its bad is cause I don't know how bad 73o is. |
|
I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] | Last edit: 14/05/2010 01:39 |
|
|
1
|
K40Cheddar   United States. May 14 2010 03:38. Posts 2202 | | |
Probably wouldn't be a bad idea to go back to NL 2/NL 5. I used to try to play NL 10 all aggressive but lost a lot of money in the process. Once I moved down again to go back to basics and tighten up, NL 10 wasn't as hard. DONT RERAISE WITH 73o. Stick to ABC poker. Read some beginner articles on hand types and don't try to go against the rules until you really know what you are doing. |
|
|
|
|