|
|
 |
may month |
 |
1
 |
Mortensen88 United Kingdom. May 23 2010 20:19. Posts 266 | | |
whatevet its not the end of may yet, but I just want to make a blog before I lose it all or something
So started off the month switching to pokerstars and I really don't see why you guys love it so much ok it was decent but the bonus literally takes 9 times as many hands to finish as full tilt according to my calculations plus no rakeback so it doesn't make sense me? graph:
ran really decent at 2nl (don't laugh) but still don't see what you guys see in it anyway
Switched back to full tilt poker using my mother's credit card (lol) and getting rakeback + bonus so literally 10% it took off ps bonus 100% ftp bonus yay plus 3 months free cardrunners and omaha manager eventually after 100 mgr...
this last surge you see is rush poker soo much fun and every hand is a theoretical vacuum to me no dynamics strangely I think I do better in this setup unfortunately
If any of you have powerpoker then please help I won 3.60 in a freeroll then was told I would not be recieveng rakeback because of other account in doyles room been playing mostly druml in this account with extremely good run hehe
|
|
| 1
| 1
| 1
 |
Jas0n United States. May 24 2010 00:42. Posts 1866 | | |
Pokerstars doesn't have rakeback because they rake considerably less than fulltilt, especially at the microstakes. At nl2, fulltilt rakes a BI every 5k hands even with 27% rb, whereas pokerstars rakes a BI every 6k hands without rakeback. Add in the fpp system, which is essentially pokerstar's form of rakeback (platinum level is equivalent to 22% rb, supernova is equivalent to 37%). At the microstakes, fulltilt rakes you so hard it's ridiculous. If you play 50k hands of nl2 a month fulltilt will rake you approximately 10 extra BIs when compared to pokerstars. |
|
| 1
 |
LiLZhiMiNG Australia. May 24 2010 08:52. Posts 637 | | |
is it just me or do those girls look extremely young? =S |
|
| 1
|
Mortensen88 United Kingdom. May 24 2010 09:12. Posts 266 | | |
| | On May 24 2010 07:52 LiLZhiMiNG wrote:
is it just me or do those girls look extremely young? =S |
yes they look around 15 and now that I'm not drunk anymore realize its creepy haha although wheree I come from 15 is legal lol |
|
| | Last edit: 24/05/2010 09:15 |
|
| |
|
|
 Poker Streams | |
|
Contact Users: 914 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 19:17
