|
|
 |
Never been so happy.../UB switch? |
 |
1
 |
Carthac United States. Oct 05 2010 03:05. Posts 1343 | | |
To be 4 BI under EV :D
New graph since I stopped playing rush and went back to 6-tabling NL10 6max
Typical old graph from when I played rush
The biggest change has to simply be the hand analysis that is in my play now, rather than having to determine what type of player they are on the fly with limited info. I can observe, take advantage of other players weaknesses appropriately, and my decisions can be much more thought out and tailored to my opponent.
I really hope I am not getting my hopes up with my improved play to just come crashing down, but this time I think I have finally found the monster leak I had playing online. I could run bad for a while(lets not hope though) and be content with my play. As long as I know I should be winning, I am content 
P.S. Thinking about switching to UB for a little bit once my full tilt bonus clears, anyone have any experience there on the amount/quality of games there are at NL10? Advice plx!
And for the finale....
|
|
| 1
 |
edzwoo United States. Oct 05 2010 03:42. Posts 5911 | | |
Rake structure is the same as Stars at 1c per 20c in pot, and you can get a good rakeback deal on the Cereus network. Since you're at the microstakes, the games should be easy regardless, but it probably will be softer even at NL10.
What you absolutely need to know though is the software is MUCH worse and there is NO timebank. You get used to it after some time but it's a pretty big sacrifice. There's also the fact that the Cereus network has all that shady history.
Definitely get off of FTP though if you're grinding NL10 or lower; even with rakeback it's pretty bad. Move to Stars if you have to. |
|
| 1
 |
GoTuNk Chile. Oct 05 2010 11:24. Posts 2860 | | |
u are obv better than the average player at ur stake, so just put in the volume
gl |
|
| |
|
|
 Poker Streams | |
|
Contact Users: 507 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 15:36
