1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Jan 11 2011 15:27. Posts 2591 | | |
Subject: Buy-in structure solution for 2011
Dear PokerStars,
I heard that you are going to be finalizing the buy-in structure for 2011 by the end of this month. I want to hopefully help in providing a well rounded solution to something that is apparently looked at with hesitancy.
The compromise to this dilemma is to keep it simple.
- Keep your current setup
- In addition to the current setup, recreate the original tables that you used to have (20-100bbs) or instead create a new bb buy-in table option of either 20-250 or 35-250 bbs
Adding back this method would allow your clients once again the absolute choice to decide both:
- with whom they want to play with
- how much they would like to put down
In this way the bottom lines that should be adhered to are addressed and all sides of this equation are able to benefit. I'm presenting this solution beyond my own personal self interest and preference. My personal preference is actually not included here. This is instead aimed more so for the long term profitable adventure of your poker site since I do believe unlike others places, PokerStars is a well intended corporation with it's clients actually in mind.
Thank you for your time
-signed
|
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
thumbz555   United States. Jan 11 2011 15:40. Posts 3281 | | |
This has got to be some of the worst advice ever submitted to stars. I hope to God they don't consider anything you recommended. |
|
|
|
1
|
Carthac   United States. Jan 11 2011 15:45. Posts 1343 | | |
I really hope you are not a shortstacker tloapc...... |
|
|
0
|
dogmeat   Czech Republic. Jan 11 2011 15:56. Posts 6374 | | |
|
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Jan 11 2011 16:03. Posts 2591 | | |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
EvilSky   Czech Republic. Jan 11 2011 16:24. Posts 8918 | | |
i dont know what tilts me more is the content itself or how you write it ... |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jan 11 2011 16:47. Posts 15163 | | |
What the fuck is the last paragraph |
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
mnj   United States. Jan 11 2011 17:22. Posts 3848 | | |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jan 11 2011 17:36. Posts 15163 | | |
I think ' long term profitable adventure' is my favourite part |
|
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Jan 11 2011 18:12. Posts 2591 | | |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
whamm!   Albania. Jan 11 2011 19:12. Posts 11625 | | |
reads like a nigerian prince letter |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Jan 11 2011 21:22. Posts 2591 | | |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
SugoGosu   Korea (South). Jan 12 2011 09:26. Posts 1793 | | |
god, guess i shouldn't play poker now. already tilted. |
|
Say this outloud! Why was six afraid of seven?......Because Seven Eight Nine | |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Jan 12 2011 10:54. Posts 2591 | | |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | Last edit: 12/01/2011 10:59 |
|
|
1
|
egood   United States. Jan 12 2011 13:07. Posts 1883 | | |
learn how to write properly you fucking mug. |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Jan 12 2011 15:04. Posts 2591 | | |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
1
|
tloapc   Pitcairn. Jan 12 2011 15:04. Posts 2591 | | |
guess I stand corrected rofl |
|
The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action. | |
|
|
|