|
|
how to end running bad |
|
1
|
K40Cheddar   United States. Jan 19 2011 03:21. Posts 2202 | | |
|
|
| 1
|
Carthac   United States. Jan 19 2011 03:30. Posts 1343 | | |
Thats what he gets for squeezing to that size |
|
| 1
|
Fudyann   Netherlands. Jan 19 2011 06:07. Posts 704 | | |
Isn't it a lot better to c/c lead or c/r lead than to c/c c/r ? |
|
| 1
|
vasoline73   United States. Jan 19 2011 06:18. Posts 810 | | |
Nh but yes lolrushaments played it awfully :X |
|
| 1
|
ThereBePoker   United Kingdom. Sep 26 2013 10:54. Posts 47 | | |
Reading through some ancient bad run blogs for some pearls of wisdom and looking at this hand the only problems I see (with rushaments) are:
1. Squeeze too small
2. C-bet too small
| On January 19 2011 05:07 Fudyann wrote:
Isn't it a lot better to c/c lead or c/r lead than to c/c c/r ? |
| On January 19 2011 05:18 vasoline73 wrote:
Nh but yes lolrushaments played it awfully :X |
Can someone explain this?
Sorry if necro is frowned upon here, I can make a new thread if necessary, although this doesn't appear to have been bumped :S |
|
| Last edit: 26/09/2013 11:11 |
|
| 4
|
Baalim   Mexico. Sep 26 2013 19:51. Posts 34262 | | |
C/C C/R is bad because it allows villian to control the size of the pot in case he doesnt have a hand strong enough to bet and bet again on the turn.
lolrushaments didnt play it awfullly, sizing is not optimal, especially the squeeze, but his flopc-bet isnt that bad when there arent many hands that give you action since you have 3 of the aces and there are no flushdraws but usually in low limits its better to punish the weak calling tendencies of bad players by betting more |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
| |
|
|
Poker Streams | |
|