1
 |
hoylemj United States. Mar 24 2011 18:02. Posts 840 | | |
I normally don't even check how much rake I've paid and I don't think that HEM is completely accurate wrt rake, but I noticed that over that last 7,157 hands I've paid $103.93 in rake (nl10).
So is it correct to say for this sample I paid rake at a rate of 14.52 bb/100?
$103.93 x 10 (bb/$) = 1,039.3 bb
1,039.3 bb /
7157 hands
-------------
0.1452 bb/h * 100 = 14.52 bb / 100h
Just wondering...
|
|
|
1
| |
yeah, your math is right, or on a glance it sounds totally right
yeah.. the rake is what it is, im pretty sure at nl100 stars so far i am raked about 5bb/100 so , yes, its significant, thats why you want to win lots |
|
| rockman255: its not easy being superman U N0 MySteeZ: mega man. rockman255: same thing U N0 MySteeZ: no | |
|
|
1
 |
Bejamin1 Canada. Mar 24 2011 18:39. Posts 7042 | | |
The math is correct. It's an extreme problem at stakes below .5/1 because there just aren't enough winners moving up through the ranks like their used to be as the game has developed a bigger group of decent players. You'd think some of the larger poker companies would want to adjust the rake at these stakes to make the games better at higher levels but unfortunately it's just an entirely greed based industry. |
|
| Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
|
1
 |
qwerty67890 New Zealand. Mar 24 2011 19:18. Posts 14026 | | |
the rake is too damn high
|
|
|
1
 |
atateconst United States. Mar 24 2011 20:12. Posts 132 | | |
Check your IM once in a while ape man, jeez. :biggrin: |
|
|
1
 |
DaEm0niCuS United States. Mar 25 2011 06:38. Posts 3292 | | | |
|
|
1
|
hoylemj United States. Jun 01 2011 00:35. Posts 840 | | |
so if I play 7k hands a day, I need to win $100 a day in order to break even. |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 276 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 08:46
