Stroggoz   New Zealand. Apr 17 2011 07:17. Posts 5328
so after taking some shots @ 1/2 ive decided to play some PLO. Main reasons are because im getting a little bored of holdem, but also because there is little HU action there. Also its scary that there are more supernova elites at the tables than fish.
After taking some shots at PLO, the games seem ridiculously soft compared to holdem. Not only that but i can get consistent heads-up action at .5/1. The game does seem a little hard to follow though, sometimes i'm really unsure of what the fish are capable of doing in this game. And i love bluffing using blockers in this game.
heres a graph of holdem results so far this year, mostly 6-9 tabling 6max (with 1 table of HU) I started to 16 table .5/1 with tableninja at the end and variance started to kick in.
other than poker i played some awesome indie games recently
1st game was called: dont look back. A very hard game but has a good storyline and atmosphere to it. i would recommend sticking with the game until its completed, (it takes 15minutes to play the whole game if you've played it before)
2nd game was called: iconoclasts. This game is kinda quirky, its a platformer game with some good humor in it. However the game is unfinished and stops halfway through.
It's amazing that these two games are probably the best ive played in the last 5 years, something really sucks with the game industry at the moment.
so yeah in conclusion PLO is:
0 votes
One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings
1
qwerty67890   New Zealand. Apr 17 2011 07:33. Posts 14026
PLO is hella fun but the NLH games just got a lot softer imo
there are Russians everywhere pissing money
1
Silver_nz   New Zealand. Apr 18 2011 05:36. Posts 5647