Party Rake

weighted rake calc is more fair no?

It is but it's = less rakeback

On August 22 2011 11:26 LemOn[5thF] wrote: weighted rake calc is more fair no?

Sure, I'm in favor of weighted rake calc (punishes the shortstackers and nits the most). But why increase the rake ffs sdflkqjsdflqkdjf

HU cap increased to 2$ what a joke

yes have already emailed them, everyone needs too

yeah cuz like, people playing nl25 and nl50 getting raked at 3$ rake was so fucking horrible for the last near-decade.. this shit is absolutely reprehensible, and i understand why this is a serious issue now.

to think high-stakers would have to pay even a fraction the % what lower-stakes players had to pay is unimaginable.

my condolences to you and to all victims. may god save you all.

Less rake for higher stakes!!

higher rake for lower stakes!!

amen, amen.

You do realize HS pays 3-4x more rake than you per month? Every hand getting capped $3 while grinding against people who actually know how to play poker, while you sit there with the lowest denominator of skill at micro. If you are so pissed about breaking even at Micro while "being better than avg" now you can look forward to a future that you will Never be able to beat Mid stakes because it just got 60% harder lol.