Hard to give an answer without knowing anything about the other two, but I think it's a get in.

I gave kimble a fairly tight cold calling range, but I'm tbh not entirely sure what peoples cc of UTG opens UTG1 look like.... Eitherway, can post the range I assigned if you want but after accounting for the premium 4%~ish 3betting hands it came out to 6.76% of hands. I gave him a flop raising range of JJ, 22, 33, Wraps+spades, KJ** with K hi spades, J45:ss and K45:ss [he should barely ever have either of these I think], and J3 w spades.

I don't know if Naka is a fish or a shorstacker, but I gave him 20% of hands minus AA, and a shoving range on flop of 2pr+, pair+FD, naked K high spades, 456, 45 spades.

Vs these two you have 36% 3 way, and 50% against kimble. If we tighten up the shortstacks range to remove K:ss, your equity actually improves to 38.8%. Likewise if we remove the random 2X, 3X spades hands.

Even if we were to narrow Kimble down to {A45:ss,456:ss,JJ} you have 32% 3 way and 40.5% against Kimble. Without the gutshot and the jack it's a clear fold.

Or are you asking if it's better to flat since kimble cant re-open betting?

Plugged in numbers to make sure...

If Kimble can't have KK /w spades, we should fold, otherwise we should get in. Unless i fucked up somewhere.

Actually a bit surprised, thought it would be a get in regardless.

thanks for responses Tian


kimble plays pretty tight and naka is bigger fish in the game


I kinda posted this just mid session to remember it for later, i like your range breakdown for him, naka i mean his range is like who the fk knows really, sometimes these type of fish see so much money in the pot and just auto jam any draw but kimble its always basically top/mid set, KKxxss and sometimes KJxxss

The first 2 bit harder to have because of J blocker and not a bunch of 33x hands in range but it always is one of these 4 hands

Don't really think any reason to just flat here although when you mention it maybe? I think with extra fish money in always have to get it in