PokerStars Zoom Hand #94194989081: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2013/02/17 19:56:06 EET [2013/02/17 12:56:06 ET]
Table Triangulum 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: matty56 ($52.58 in chips)
Seat 2: stoupaone ($63.19 in chips)
Seat 3: Omar030 ($50.83 in chips)
Seat 4: Hero ($100 in chips)
Seat 5: rjqwoddl ($100 in chips)
Seat 6: stevesmells ($100 in chips)
stoupaone: posts small blind $0.50
Omar030: posts big blind $1
Holecards
Dealt to Hero
Hero: raises $2 to $3
rjqwoddl: folds
stevesmells: folds
matty56: calls $3
stoupaone: folds
Omar030: calls $2
Flop (Pot : $9.50)
Omar030: checks
Hero: bets $7
matty56: folds
Omar030: calls $7
Turn (Pot : $23.50)
Omar030: bets $40.83 and is all-in
Hero said, "great valubet"
Hero: folds
Uncalled bet ($40.83) returned to Omar030
Omar030 collected $22.44 from pot
Omar030: doesnt show hand
Summary
Total pot $23.50 | Rake $1.06
Board
Seat 1: matty56 (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: stoupaone (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: Omar030 (big blind) collected ($22.44)
Seat 4: Hero folded on the Turn
Seat 5: rjqwoddl folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: stevesmells folded before Flop (didnt bet)
1
|
ToT)MidiaN(   United Kingdom. Feb 17 2013 14:11. Posts 5070 | | |
Don't like folding here vs a blatant fish ;/ He can prob show up with random Q8 Q9 AQ Kd9x and such shit often enough + you're not dead when he does have JT/flush |
|
One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope | |
|
|
1
| |
Yea that looks dumb enough for me to call. |
|
|
1
|
Oly   United Kingdom. Feb 17 2013 14:24. Posts 3585 | | |
And don't forget a spazz-panicking 2pair or set. |
|
Researchers used brain scans to show that when straight men looked at pictures of women in bikinis, areas of the brain that normally light up in anticipation of using tools, like spanners and screwdrivers, were activated. | |
|
|
1
|
lebowski   Greece. Feb 17 2013 14:26. Posts 9205 | | |
I don't think he's a fish with the traditional sense more like a reg fish, he plays 21/16 6.5 3bet over 250 hands, so do I put him on a pair + spazz and click call? Given that it was 3way on flop I think it would be a mistake, true that it would be a small one with my top set equity but still |
|
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
|
lebowski   Greece. Feb 17 2013 14:37. Posts 9205 | | |
so does anything change given that he's not someone who doesn't understand relative hand strength?
am I such a huge nit for folding this?
oh lord whyyyyyyy
edit:srsly though what did he flat flop with that he then tuned into a bluff? I still think it's a fold -_- |
|
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | Last edit: 17/02/2013 14:56 |
|
|
1
|
TalentedTom   Canada. Feb 17 2013 16:10. Posts 20070 | | |
I would call here almost always vs some random spazz |
|
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
|
Bejamin1   Canada. Feb 17 2013 16:15. Posts 7042 | | |
| On February 17 2013 15:10 TalentedTom wrote:
I would call here almost always vs some random spazz |
This.
|
|
Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
|
1
|
Mardagg   Germany. Feb 17 2013 16:35. Posts 843 | | |
|
|
1
|
Mardagg   Germany. Feb 17 2013 16:37. Posts 843 | | |
| [B]edit:srsly though what did he flat flop with that he then tuned into a bluff? I still think it's a fold -_- |
apart from random spazzes,2 pairs.etc. i can see a player like him exactly play 88 or 99 this way. |
|
|
1
|
lebowski   Greece. Feb 17 2013 16:50. Posts 9205 | | |
so you guys don't even agree that we are bluff catching?
mardagg tell me what 2 pair you think he plays like this given that I have AA. I said he isn't a fish he is a shortstack bad reg with somewhat reasonable stats over 250 hands, if this is a call it's because we assume he spazz overbet bluffs with something, what do you think that is? Do you often see regs play sets like this when I could have all straights and flushes?
Maybe it is a call and the fold is terrible because the line is too weird to be for value and I have top of my range, but don't tell me we aren't bluff catching here and that he could be shoving worse for value like this (esp when most 2 pairs are ruled out by me having top set and
I expect him to squeeze AQ pre anyway)
|
|
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | Last edit: 17/02/2013 17:03 |
|
|
1
|
SpasticInk   Sweden. Feb 17 2013 17:37. Posts 6298 | | |
Seat 3: Omar030 ($50.83 in chips) |
|
|
1
|
lebowski   Greece. Feb 17 2013 17:40. Posts 9205 | | |
| On February 17 2013 16:37 SpasticInk wrote:
Seat 3: Omar030 ($50.83 in chips) |
ps is full of these people,lately more than ever
(40-50 bb regs) |
|
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | Last edit: 17/02/2013 17:43 |
|
|
1
|
the cleaner   Germany. Feb 17 2013 17:42. Posts 3014 | | |
| On February 17 2013 13:24 Oly wrote:
And don't forget a spazz-panicking 2pair or set. |
+1
this and the fact that we have outs to improve |
|
there are no facts only interpretations | |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Feb 17 2013 17:47. Posts 15163 | | |
can someone shoe me an example of a range that you think he's doing this with? Like entire range in stove? |
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 17/02/2013 17:58 |
|
|
1
|
Mardagg   Germany. Feb 17 2013 18:44. Posts 843 | | |
| On February 17 2013 15:50 lebowski wrote:
mardagg tell me what 2 pair you think he plays like this given that I have AA. I said he isn't a fish he is a shortstack bad reg with somewhat reasonable stats over 250 hands
|
ok,so assuming i give him the credit to be somewhat bad regiish you still totally dominate 88,99 and have several outs vs the flush and str8 hands this guy is willing to play from the BB.Add to this like 5-10% other hands,which you can never exclude completely after just 250 hands from villain.
I think you are overthinking this hand way too much.
its just clear to me that the mistake you make by calling here with top set vs a made flush or str8 is much,much lower than to fold top set here vs 888 or 999 (or worse).
U can argue,would he play a set like this on the flop?
Ok, but if he would play it like this ,his turn push would make sense,because thats a scare card for him,he wants to protect his monster.
On the other hand,wouldnt he try to go for the check raise with the flush on the turn?
|
|
|
|