PokerStars Hand #97485899913: Holdem No Limit ($5/$10 USD) - 2013/04/21 11:34:46 ET
Table Gansu II 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: patapong ($2456 in chips)
Seat 3: Audiotik ($1731.50 in chips)
Seat 4: longple ($4123 in chips)
Seat 5: cmontopdeck ($1076 in chips)
Audiotik: posts small blind $5
longple: posts big blind $10
patapong: posts the ante $2
Audiotik: posts the ante $2
longple: posts the ante $2
cmontopdeck: posts the ante $2
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to longple
cmontopdeck: folds
patapong: folds
Audiotik: raises $20 to $30
longple: calls $20
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $60.00)
Audiotik: bets $50
longple: calls $50
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $160.00)
Audiotik: bets $120
longple: calls $120
River (Pot : $400.00)
Audiotik: bets $340
asafber said, "floooooop"
asafber said, "folddd"
asafber said, "cant handle the preasure"
asafber said, "lol"
longple: calls $340
Showdown
Audiotik: shows (high card Ace)
longple: shows (high card Ace)
Audiotik collected $543.25 from pot
longple collected $543.25 from pot
Summary
Total pot $1088 | Rake $1.50
Board
Seat 1: patapong (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 3: Audiotik (small blind) showed and won ($543.25) with high card Ace
Seat 4: longple (big blind) showed and won ($543.25) with high card Ace
Seat 5: cmontopdeck folded before Flop (didnt bet)
1
|
longple   Sweden. Apr 21 2013 11:38. Posts 4472 | | |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Apr 21 2013 11:39. Posts 15163 | | |
|
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 21 2013 11:40. Posts 6540 | | |
pity he had KQ lol nice call |
|
|
|
1
|
longple   Sweden. Apr 21 2013 11:45. Posts 4472 | | |
his comment after was "5/10 regs <3"
if he disrespects 5/10 regs (hes a nosebleedsreg)
i really cant see the point of him barreling off here this wide, like if he barrels KQ then he barrels every gutter that missed too? if i were him (judgeing from his comment assumeing im a bad 5/10 random reg) i would ch/call KQ, i can have 1 million draws and my Jx wont valuebet
[x] hope |
|
| Last edit: 21/04/2013 11:56 |
|
|
1
|
ytricky   Germany. Apr 21 2013 11:51. Posts 600 | | |
Analysing the hand you really realize how much air people have here compared to valuehands and how even K high is a good call down. Nice one. |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 21 2013 11:52. Posts 6540 | | |
hehe nl for 100bb i think is fairly solved..
no one really has a good winrate. deep games are obv different. but this is fairly standard and i think alot of regs will call.
that fact that he is nosebleeder doesnt make him better.. most people at 5/10 is very solid, mainly depends how well you run and how many tables ur playing imo..
dont overvalue his skill just coz he played nosebleed.. |
|
The Last Laugh. | Last edit: 21/04/2013 11:53 |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Apr 21 2013 12:09. Posts 15163 | | |
Solved? Surely there are still people that can beat the rake with a good winrate no?
Tough to prove without PTR |
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 21/04/2013 12:09 |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 21 2013 12:41. Posts 6540 | | |
ofcourse there are.. who ever is running hot will win |
|
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Apr 21 2013 13:27. Posts 15163 | | |
I dunno, when PTR was on there was quite a few big steady winners at the stakes has it changed so much rly? aren't even them nanonoko's and poboleros of today winning? |
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
longple   Sweden. Apr 21 2013 13:45. Posts 4472 | | |
plenty as in some sickos
and midstakes as in 3/6-5/10 and some rare 10/20 bumhunting |
|
| Last edit: 21/04/2013 13:45 |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 21 2013 13:45. Posts 6540 | | |
lol far from it..
i was one of those people longple. i would be far more qualified to speak on behalf of those people.. |
|
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Apr 21 2013 13:56. Posts 15163 | | |
I thought your winrate was never up there with the best, you always seemed to have an insane work ethic tho |
|
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 21 2013 14:01. Posts 6540 | | |
my winrate was pretty good. twice the table than most regs. i had 400$/h for 5 years. you can count with the fingers of your hands the people who beat that. 3bb/100 over 7 mill hands.
anyone who thinks NL is easy is probably just running hot now. |
|
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 21 2013 14:06. Posts 6540 | | |
im talking 5/10+ btw..
2/4 and 3/6 i reckon icould still beat 2bb/100 |
|
|
|
1
| |
he play on 888 to, play nl20k |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Apr 21 2013 16:39. Posts 15163 | | |
whats his screen nam there?
|
|
|
|
1
| |
its the same :o
met him real life too, hes seemed like a nice guy xd |
|
|
4
|
Baalim   Mexico. May 04 2013 01:58. Posts 34262 | | |
| On April 21 2013 10:52 wobbly_au wrote:
hehe nl for 100bb i think is fairly solved..
no one really has a good winrate. deep games are obv different. but this is fairly standard and i think alot of regs will call.
that fact that he is nosebleeder doesnt make him better.. most people at 5/10 is very solid, mainly depends how well you run and how many tables ur playing imo..
dont overvalue his skill just coz he played nosebleed.. |
Not solved at all wobbles, we just all suck at a very alike level. |
|
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
|