Wtf I dont understand this.

isn't this a very weak hand to be 3-betting OOP?

I immagine many players have a very polarized value range here (they dont shove QQxx, AAxx, or KTxx) for value like this but they bluff the blocker(s) 100% of the time
Also given how weak /wide his button opening range is, we should logically be bluffing him a lot. Perhaps you are being overaggro and not balanced enough here



...


Or he's just a terrible calling station

Ok I did some calcs:

Lets say I have a tight 3b range of 6.6%: ((AA:xx,KK$ds,KK$N$N:[Kx+]x,KKxx[43+],[53+]),$0g:xxy,$1g$ds,8764+:xxy,T976+:xxy,JT96+$ds,789+:Axx,AK$N:AxxKyy,AQ$N$N:AxxQyy,KQ$N$N:KxxQyy,15%:RROO$ds)$nt)

(I am probably even tighter actually, but its close I guess.)

Then lets assume I will take the bet-bet-bet line with
a) all flushes and all nut-flush-blockers
b) 9-or-higher flushes and all nut-flush-blockers
c) 9-or-higher flushes and 75% of nut-flush-blockers
d) all flushes and 75% of nut-flush-blockers

Then I will be bluffing:
a) 27% of the time. => He has about breakeven call/fold situation on the river in this scenario.
b) 34% of the time => slightly but definitely profitable call.
c) 28% of the time => very very slightly +ev call.
d) 21% of the time => slightly but definitely -ev call

Well I guess it wasnt that bad at all from him then

Probably should have had a bit smaller betsizing on flop and turn. Or go for the 3-barells only when bit deeper.