|
|
Show hand : 1030810 |
|
Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1030810 Submitted by : skirmisher
PokerStars Hand #112958883923: Holdem No Limit ($0.01/$0.02 USD) - 2014/03/08 12:18:25 ET
Table Dunant 9-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: CrazyyParis ($2.91 in chips)
Seat 2: Miti_Petkov ($2.38 in chips)
Seat 3: stasnest ($0.77 in chips)
Seat 4: Julia776235 ($0.83 in chips)
Seat 5: titanik80 ($0.70 in chips)
Seat 6: Superfelis ($1.42 in chips)
Seat 7: Cepillo ($1.80 in chips)
Seat 8: CherT678 ($2.40 in chips)
Seat 9: pudGG ($2.17 in chips)
Superfelis: posts small blind $0.01
Cepillo: posts big blind $0.02
Holecards Dealt to pudGG
CherT678: folds
pudGG: raises $0.05 to $0.07
CrazyyParis: raises $0.13 to $0.20
Miti_Petkov: calls $0.20
stasnest: folds
Julia776235: folds
titanik80: folds
Superfelis: folds
Cepillo: folds
pudGG: calls $0.13
Flop (Pot : $0.63)
pudGG: checks
CrazyyParis: bets $0.45
Miti_Petkov: calls $0.45
pudGG: folds
Turn (Pot : $1.53)
CrazyyParis: bets $1.16
Miti_Petkov: folds
Uncalled bet ($1.16) returned to CrazyyParis
CrazyyParis collected $1.48 from pot
CrazyyParis: doesnt show hand
Summary Total pot $1.53 | Rake $0.05
Board
Seat 1: CrazyyParis collected ($1.48)
Seat 2: Miti_Petkov folded on the Turn
Seat 3: stasnest folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: Julia776235 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: titanik80 (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: Superfelis (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: Cepillo (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 8: CherT678 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 9: pudGG folded on the Flop
|
Comments |
|
1
|
skirmisher   Sweden. Mar 08 2014 15:06. Posts 103 | | |
Miti Petkov plays 40% of hands (raises 20%) but the other guy was 6%/3% so no easy money. Do I reraise/fold preflop instead of calling? |
|
New player, advice appreciated | |
|
| 1
|
waga   United Kingdom. Mar 08 2014 15:14. Posts 2375 | | |
the guy who 3bet you play 6/3 ?
pretty sure you can laugh and fold with a big smile |
|
| 1
|
bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Mar 08 2014 15:15. Posts 8649 | | |
haha 6/3 is the future of poker |
|
|
| 1
|
Trav94   Canada. Mar 08 2014 17:08. Posts 1789 | | |
If he's 6/3, probably only 3betting like QQ+. You have 34% equity vs that range. So you need basically 2-1. In this spot, the calling the 3bet isn't mathematically bad because you are getting great odds. Fold flop as played. Generally though vs a 6/3 nit like that you can just fold pre. |
|
| Last edit: 08/03/2014 17:12 |
|
| 1
|
skirmisher   Sweden. Mar 08 2014 17:11. Posts 103 | | |
Thanks for the answers, what if the dude is like 20/10? Do I check/fold flop here? And what do I do preflop? |
|
New player, advice appreciated | |
|
| 1
|
Trav94   Canada. Mar 08 2014 17:16. Posts 1789 | | |
You're OOP, so 4betting is probably best vs a 20/10 guy in this spot, If he's 3betting TT+,AQs+,AQo+, you have 51%. I think you're almost always c/f this specific flop here 3-way. |
|
| 1
|
waga   United Kingdom. Mar 08 2014 18:23. Posts 2375 | | |
| On March 08 2014 16:08 Trav94 wrote:
If he's 6/3, probably only 3betting like QQ+. You have 34% equity vs that range. So you need basically 2-1. In this spot, the calling the 3bet isn't mathematically bad because you are getting great odds. Fold flop as played. Generally though vs a 6/3 nit like that you can just fold pre. |
Nope.
I don't play nlhe anymore (and for a long time) but that's just wrong.
it would be true if they were all in.
It is mathecally bad , because of the implied odds.
For the same reason it's bad to call A7o or whatever.
Outnit the nit |
|
| 1
|
Trav94   Canada. Mar 08 2014 18:33. Posts 1789 | | |
| On March 08 2014 17:23 waga wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 08 2014 16:08 Trav94 wrote:
If he's 6/3, probably only 3betting like QQ+. You have 34% equity vs that range. So you need basically 2-1. In this spot, the calling the 3bet isn't mathematically bad because you are getting great odds. Fold flop as played. Generally though vs a 6/3 nit like that you can just fold pre. |
Nope.
I don't play nlhe anymore (and for a long time) but that's just wrong.
it would be true if they were all in.
It is mathecally bad , because of the implied odds.
For the same reason it's bad to call A7o or whatever.
Outnit the nit
|
Makes sense now that I look back, I had it right the first time, then changed my post. Stupid me. |
|
| |
|
|
Poker Streams | |
|