PokerStars Hand #113676264220: Holdem No Limit ($0.05/$0.10 USD) - 2014/03/22 14:03:33 PT [2014/03/22 17:03:33 ET]
Table Kobolda II 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: shamrockkick ($2.70 in chips)
Seat 2: nklbrkr ($17.56 in chips)
Seat 3: Hero ($10 in chips)
Seat 4: brit014 ($7.50 in chips)
Seat 5: 7024844 ($6.76 in chips)
Seat 6: m4rc4 ($8.57 in chips)
brit014: posts small blind $0.05
7024844: posts big blind $0.10
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero 
m4rc4: raises $0.25 to $0.35
shamrockkick: folds
nklbrkr: folds
Hero: raises $0.95 to $1.30
brit014: folds
7024844: raises $2.10 to $3.40
m4rc4: folds
Hero: raises $6.60 to $10 and is all-in
7024844: calls $3.36 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($3.24) returned to Hero
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $13.92)
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $13.92)
River (Pot : $13.92)
Showdown
7024844: shows 
(a pair of Aces)
Hero: shows (a pair of Queens)
7024844 collected $13.29 from pot
Summary
Total pot $13.92 | Rake $0.63
Board
Seat 1: shamrockkick folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: nklbrkr folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 3: Hero (button) showed and lost with a pair of Queens
Seat 4: brit014 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: 7024844 (big blind) showed and won ($13.29) with a pair of Aces
Seat 6: m4rc4 folded before Flop
1
 |
Trav94 Canada. Mar 22 2014 17:09. Posts 1789 | | |
Guy 4betting appears to be a fish. 54/43 over small sample though 20 hands. 0% 3bet. Cooler I guess? I mean he did 4bet for over 50% of stack, so I did think about overpairs, but I just couldn't fold here. |
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Mar 22 2014 17:23. Posts 15163 | | |
this is good, the raiser is a fish too I assume? he might even call with JJ TT some too |
| |
|
|
1
|
Trav94 Canada. Mar 22 2014 17:40. Posts 1789 | | |
2nd hand on raiser, not sure |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Mar 22 2014 18:15. Posts 15163 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
|
Trav94 Canada. Mar 22 2014 18:32. Posts 1789 | | |
Doesn't necessarily make him a fish. But yea, most likely |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Mar 22 2014 18:37. Posts 15163 | | |
makes it way more likely that he is tho, against a reg that pots utg I flat the QQ pre |
| |
|
|
1
| |
| | On March 22 2014 17:37 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
makes it way more likely that he is tho, against a reg that pots utg I flat the QQ pre |
lol. lemon. you never cease to amaze me. |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Mar 23 2014 10:11. Posts 15163 | | |
| | On March 23 2014 01:26 devon06atX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 22 2014 17:37 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
makes it way more likely that he is tho, against a reg that pots utg I flat the QQ pre |
lol. lemon. you never cease to amaze me.
|
I dont follow |
| |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Mar 23 2014 10:39. Posts 15163 | | |
calling QQ vs reg utg with standard 13-14% raise range could not possibly amaze you oO |
| |
|
|
1
 |
lebowski Greece. Mar 23 2014 10:51. Posts 9205 | | |
he probably thinks that it's best to raise as a standard,lol |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Mar 23 2014 12:47. Posts 15163 | | |
I guess so? Most ranges from people like Janda etc. have QQ standard as flat v UTG I know it's arguable and some people prefer 3B but there's no way that could "amaze" Devon? |
| |
|
|
1
| |
| | On March 23 2014 11:47 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
I guess so? Most ranges from people like Janda etc. have QQ standard as flat v UTG I know it's arguable and some people prefer 3B but there's no way that could "amaze" Devon? |
I suppose I'm easily amazed lol.
I mean... it's qq.. and your standard play is to not 3b vs an utg raiser? I dunno. It's just crazy. In fact, It Amazes Me! haha. I'm quite certain your 'standard' play would be to 3bet me (even as an utg raise) with aa, kk, qq, jj (sometimes), ak, aq (again, sometimes), and some suited connectors bullshit from time to time.
Know what I'm saying holmes? |
|
|
1
| |
New idea. 3.5x all pocket pairs so as to discourage people not to 3b me with their typical 3b hands? I might be onto something here. |
|
|
1
| |
I find even the good regs incorrectly call with their low pocket pairs hoping to set mine from time to time when getting piss poor odds. |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Mar 23 2014 14:45. Posts 15163 | | |
| | On March 23 2014 13:01 devon06atX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 23 2014 11:47 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
I guess so? Most ranges from people like Janda etc. have QQ standard as flat v UTG I know it's arguable and some people prefer 3B but there's no way that could "amaze" Devon? |
I suppose I'm easily amazed lol.
I mean... it's qq.. and your standard play is to not 3b vs an utg raiser? I dunno. It's just crazy. In fact, It Amazes Me! haha. I'm quite certain your 'standard' play would be to 3bet me (even as an utg raise) with aa, kk, qq, jj (sometimes), ak, aq (again, sometimes), and some suited connectors bullshit from time to time.
Know what I'm saying holmes?
|
yeah you're a spewtard and you know I'm a spewtard you also raise more than normal utg pretty sure
but vs normal 13-14% ish range without history or with tight image I flat QQ and AKo as especially with QQ it's not good to shove over a 4bet v UTG.
And I never 3bet suited connectors vs utg unless he folds way too much. But don't start check shoving low boards now xD |
| |
|
|
1
| |
| | On March 23 2014 13:45 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
[QUOTE]On March 23 2014 13:01 devon06atX wrote:
[QUOTE]On March 23 2014 11:47 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
And I never 3bet suited connectors vs utg unless he folds way too much. But don't start check shoving low boards now xD |
lol, roger  |
|
|
1
| |
If you are 3betting qq+ ak you will have a terribly unbalanced calling range. Even at microstakes its important to start balancing your pf ranges. |
|
| | Last edit: 23/03/2014 22:17 |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 1012 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 07:28
