PokerStars Hand #114973528917: Holdem No Limit ($0.08/$0.16 USD) - 2014/04/18 21:31:14 CET [2014/04/18 15:31:14 ET]
Table Sextans IV 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: Piotr280688 ($16.25 in chips)
Seat 2: brcor ($21.10 in chips)
Seat 3: agressniko ($16 in chips)
Seat 4: sergunia-75 ($5.14 in chips)
Seat 5: DoC.LemOn ($16 in chips)
Seat 6: deppor! ($9.16 in chips)
deppor!: posts small blind $0.08
Piotr280688: posts big blind $0.16
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to DoC.LemOn 
brcor: raises $0.32 to $0.48
agressniko: folds
sergunia-75: folds
DoC.LemOn: calls $0.48
deppor!: calls $0.40
Piotr280688: calls $0.32
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $1.92)
deppor!: checks
Piotr280688: checks
brcor: checks
DoC.LemOn: bets $1.33
deppor!: folds
Piotr280688: folds
brcor: calls $1.33
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $4.58)
brcor: checks
DoC.LemOn: bets $2.88
brcor: calls $2.88
River (Pot : $10.34)
brcor: checks
DoC.LemOn: bets $11.31 and is all-in
brcor: calls $11.31
Showdown
DoC.LemOn: shows (three of a kind, Fours)
brcor: shows 
(three of a kind, Sixes)
brcor collected $31.48 from pot
Summary
Total pot $32.96 | Rake $1.48
Board
Seat 1: Piotr280688 (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: brcor showed and won ($31.48) with three of a kind, Sixes
Seat 3: agressniko folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: sergunia-75 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: DoC.LemOn (button) showed and lost with three of a kind, Fours
Seat 6: deppor! (small blind) folded on the Flop
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 18 2014 15:34. Posts 15163 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
 |
r0mx0 Slovakia. Apr 18 2014 15:35. Posts 1581 | | |
 sizing !
|
|
| You gotta plow through that shit ! | |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 18 2014 15:48. Posts 15163 | | |
you know why I chose it tho ye? are those reasons bad? |
|
| 93% Sure! | Last edit: 18/04/2014 15:48 |
|
|
1
|
r0mx0 Slovakia. Apr 18 2014 15:54. Posts 1581 | | |
no tell me ... if he has overpair or flush draw or maybe 89cc T9cc or 55 ? 77 ? is he really folding turn when u bet more ? u think that he will push over that weak looking bet OTT or ? |
|
| You gotta plow through that shit ! | |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 18 2014 16:07. Posts 15163 | | |
1) I expect his range to be skewed heavily towards weaker made hands
2) 4w flop if I bomb turn my range looks super strong - I rep a draw way better when I use this sizing progression |
| |
|
|
0
 |
dogmeat Czech Republic. Apr 18 2014 18:11. Posts 6374 | | |
| | On April 18 2014 15:07 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
I rep a draw way better when I use this sizing progression |
theory fail... its best to bet equal fractions of pot w/ polarized range |
|
| ban baal | Last edit: 18/04/2014 18:12 |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 18 2014 18:21. Posts 15163 | | |
| | On April 18 2014 17:11 dogmeat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2014 15:07 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
I rep a draw way better when I use this sizing progression |
theory fail... its best to bet equal fractions of pot w/ polarized range
|
Yeah I dunno when I don't think villain has a lot of draws but I have a lot of em in my range and/or im obviously polarized I've been doing t his for ages - just tell a story, try to rep a draw as best as I can..pure exploitive line for L2 villains mostly - I do it only with strong hands pretty much and use geometric sizing for bluffs.
I guess it's lolbad if someone actually figures this out or if I want to play my range properly vs someone actually good- I know what Zazano had to say about that esp, in 3b pots, he doesn't believe in the smaller T size to leave big R size to have "more FE" on the river where all it does is is make the price on the bluff worse on the river for no reason and you take down smaller pot when it does work - is that what you mean? |
|
| 93% Sure! | Last edit: 18/04/2014 18:36 |
|
|
0
|
dogmeat Czech Republic. Apr 18 2014 19:14. Posts 6374 | | |
| | On April 18 2014 17:21 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
I guess it's lolbad if someone actually figures this out or if I want to play my range properly vs someone actually good- I know what Zazano had to say about that esp, in 3b pots, he doesn't believe in the smaller T size to leave big R size to have "more FE" on the river where all it does is is make the price on the bluff worse on the river for no reason and you take down smaller pot when it does work - is that what you mean? |
i dont understand a word  basically geometric growth requires vil. to call with bigger portion of his bluffcatchers even thou you are allowed to bluff less |
| |
|
|
1
 |
GoldRush United States. Apr 18 2014 23:39. Posts 1025 | | |
this hand is pretty much get the chips in and next hand. |
|
|
1
|
GoldRush United States. Apr 18 2014 23:40. Posts 1025 | | |
your turn sizing can be fixed for the river jam in future tho, bet 3.5 |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 1175 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 14:49
