Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1033590 Submitted by : Trav94
PokerStars Hand #114995487008: Holdem No Limit ($0.05/$0.10 USD) - 2014/04/19 1:05:09 PT [2014/04/19 4:05:09 ET]
Table Argelander 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($16.49 in chips)
Seat 2: Naildey ($10.14 in chips)
Seat 3: manofharts ($9.92 in chips)
Seat 4: DaniC00 ($12.39 in chips)
DaniC00: posts small blind $0.05
Hero: posts big blind $0.10
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to Hero
dwyt84 leaves the table
Naildey: folds
VVVictorYYY joins the table at seat #5
manofharts: folds
DaniC00: raises $0.20 to $0.30
Hero: raises $0.60 to $0.90
DaniC00: raises $1.30 to $2.20
Hero: raises $14.29 to $16.49 and is all-in
DaniC00: calls $10.19 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($4.10) returned to Hero
*** FIRST FLOP ***
*** FIRST TURN ***
*** FIRST RIVER ***
*** SECOND FLOP ***
*** SECOND TURN ***
*** SECOND RIVER ***
*** FIRST SHOW DOWN ***
DaniC00: shows (two pair, Aces and Kings)
Hero: shows (two pair, Kings and Queens)
DaniC00 collected $11.89 from pot
*** SECOND SHOW DOWN ***
DaniC00: shows (a full house, Threes full of Aces)
Hero: shows (a full house, Threes full of Queens)
DaniC00 collected $11.89 from pot
Summary Total pot $24.78 | Rake $1
Hand was run twice
Board
Board
Seat 1: Hero (big blind) showed and lost with two pair, Kings and Queens, and lost with a full house, Threes full of Queens
Seat 2: Naildey folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 3: manofharts (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: DaniC00 (small blind) showed and won ($11.89) with two pair, Aces and Kings, and won ($11.89) with a full house, Threes full of Aces
|
Comments |
|
1
|
Trav94   Canada. Apr 19 2014 04:10. Posts 1789 | | |
22/20/5 over 60 hands, AF 2. I always feel like I could get away here after it's over, but I don't even know right now. 12 buy-in downswing over last 5k hands. I don't even know anymore . |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Apr 19 2014 04:29. Posts 15163 | | |
yeah like noway it's -ev BvB
but...I always wonder about these sizings these days
it's 120bb deep and he made it so small OOP, should we have a small 5b range and call ranges here? |
|
|
| 1
|
Trav94   Canada. Apr 19 2014 04:33. Posts 1789 | | |
How do you feel about just flatting? I guess all the money goes in on a low card flop anyway? |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Apr 19 2014 05:21. Posts 15163 | | |
not with QQ, you flop overcard some 40% of the time, 4b bluffs have too much equity vs you and 4b is +ev guaranteed, it's not deep enough
but like overall with a polarized range he can play pretty much perfectly vs you with that sizing won't really make any mistakes when you shove fold vs that only. It's not a concern at micros really focusing elsewhere will bring you way more ev but just something to consider - having a small 5b range with a couple great bluff hands in it might be better here |
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 19/04/2014 05:49 |
|
| 1
|
goose58   United States. Apr 19 2014 06:47. Posts 871 | | |
100bb this is super standard.
125bb things get trickier.
The big key here is his 4bet range/4bet %, which should be on your HUD. Some players will 3bet and 4bet/get it in with the same range, so QQ is fine against a range of JJ+/AK. BUT, some players ONLY 4bet AA/KK, and call 3bets with AK/QQ-. A 60 hand sample is so small, but his 3bet % is telling.
This guy is pretty nitty, he has nitty stats/3bet stats which in my experience means his 4bet % is nitty as well.
If this was me, I'd either get it in preflop, or call and get it in on non AK flops. The sample size is too small to fold after we make our mandatory 3bet BvB, but if you have a bigger 3bet/4bet sample, you could potentially fold this if his true 3bet/4bet stats prove to be nitty.
Lastly, depending on his BvB steal %, you should be 3betting fairly liberally against anyone who is opening BvB wide-ish. Once you establish a 3bet/4bet game BvB, you can feel comfortable/happy/ecstatic getting it in here with QQ. |
|
| Last edit: 19/04/2014 06:47 |
|
| |
|
All hands submitted by Trav94: |
|
|