Let's assume he's a reg with some sort of a brain

I rep pretty much 0 bluffs when I bet here.
On the other hand his range will be loads of Jx, 66-88 etc. that'll just X behind.

Guess I'm kinda hand cuffed into betting smallish here?

bet, bet what u think a J will call?

yeah meh... prolly shouldn't
so bet vs unknown/bad
check vs v. good players

If you mean turn doubt J is ever folding no and this is a rly bad hand to 3barrel with

Lets just assume nl25 players are capable of making bad calls. When he checks back turn hes repping Ax and Jx. Just bet 2/3rd pot and see if he looks you up.

go like $6.55

He isn't repping anything with his check, he is playing his hand for what it is. Which isn't much because he checked back turn. Bet river. Only reason for checking is to check/raise.
Overthinking about all this who is repping what again. Playing a hand doesn't get much easier than this here.

On April 25 2014 11:58 cariadon wrote: Only reason for checking is to check/raise.

On April 25 2014 11:58 cariadon wrote: He isn't repping anything with his check, he is playing his hand for what it is. Which isn't much because he checked back turn. Bet river. Only reason for checking is to check/raise. Overthinking about all this who is repping what again. Playing a hand doesn't get much easier than this here.

Repping = Villain is representing X range of hands. Its bad to say that he HAS a hand because we arent wizards and villains are capable of anything. Regardless if hes knowingly repping a hand or not, the term is correct.

On April 25 2014 11:14 handbanana21 wrote: Lets just assume nl25 players are capable of making bad calls. When he checks back turn hes repping Ax and Jx. Just bet 2/3rd pot and see if he looks you up.

yeah it's always a bet without a hud, he called my 70% ish bet with QTo he somehow checked oO

Let's say I play someone very very good, like Cariadon - check raise is more suitable right?

On April 25 2014 12:48 handbanana21 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 25 2014 11:58 cariadon wrote: He isn't repping anything with his check, he is playing his hand for what it is. Which isn't much because he checked back turn. Bet river. Only reason for checking is to check/raise. Overthinking about all this who is repping what again. Playing a hand doesn't get much easier than this here. Repping = Villain is representing X range of hands. Its bad to say that he HAS a hand because we arent wizards and villains are capable of anything. Regardless if hes knowingly repping a hand or not, the term is correct.

Jx and Ax, nice range dude ! Everything became crystal clear. Not really. Another failure to even attempt at grasping the idea behind this hand.
This hand is about how to get the most money in the middle on river. Just by glancing at the board one can tell he can't often have much. 5x plays itself, the rest he has is garbage. From my experience leading beats check/raising here.

On April 25 2014 17:13 LemOn[5thF] wrote: Show nested quote + On April 25 2014 11:14 handbanana21 wrote: Lets just assume nl25 players are capable of making bad calls. When he checks back turn hes repping Ax and Jx. Just bet 2/3rd pot and see if he looks you up. yeah it's always a bet without a hud, he called my 70% ish bet with QTo he somehow checked oO Let's say I play someone very very good, like Cariadon - check raise is more suitable right?

No.

It must really suck to be you. Im sorry dude.

You are fucking retarded. So when he checks he only has Jx or Ax ? What the fuck? He can't have worse? What the fuck are you implying here wanker?
Your ramblings are still irrelevant in this hand. Don't need to assign no range here on river so get a clue.

LOL