|
|
Show hand : 1033968 |
|
Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1033968 Submitted by : Sliggy
PokerStars Hand #115462011393: Holdem No Limit ($0.05/$0.10 USD) - 2014/04/29 18:53:09 AEST [2014/04/29 4:53:09 ET]
Table Aoluta III 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Never_Foldxx ($26.76 in chips)
Seat 2: limlg7788 ($10.05 in chips)
Seat 3: luckyfish311 ($11.37 in chips)
Seat 4: Hero ($10 in chips)
Seat 5: skylineclub1 ($5.60 in chips)
Seat 6: psfkorom ($8.48 in chips)
limlg7788: posts small blind $0.05
luckyfish311: posts big blind $0.10
Holecards Dealt to Hero
Hero: raises $0.20 to $0.30
skylineclub1: calls $0.30
psfkorom: folds
Never_Foldxx: folds
limlg7788: folds
luckyfish311: calls $0.20
Flop (Pot : $0.95)
luckyfish311: checks
Hero: bets $0.70
skylineclub1: folds
luckyfish311: calls $0.70
Turn (Pot : $2.35)
luckyfish311: checks
Hero: bets $1.70
luckyfish311: calls $1.70
River (Pot : $5.75)
luckyfish311: checks
Hero: bets $2.70
luckyfish311: raises $5.97 to $8.67 and is all-in
Hero said, "whats with people hitting flushes against my sets today =["
Hero: folds
Uncalled bet ($5.97) returned to luckyfish311
luckyfish311 collected $10.65 from pot
luckyfish311: doesnt show hand
Summary Total pot $11.15 | Rake $0.50
Board
Seat 1: Never_Foldxx (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: limlg7788 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: luckyfish311 (big blind) collected ($10.65)
Seat 4: Hero folded on the River
Seat 5: skylineclub1 folded on the Flop
Seat 6: psfkorom folded before Flop (didnt bet)
|
Comments |
|
1
|
Sliggy   Australia. Apr 29 2014 05:02. Posts 742 | | |
Obvious fold.
Question: should I even bet this river? I don't know if I'm being results oriented but it feels like I should. Checking it back is awful right? |
|
|
| 1
|
bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Apr 29 2014 05:29. Posts 8649 | | |
|
|
| 1
|
napoleono   Romania. Apr 29 2014 05:49. Posts 771 | | |
This can be pretty exploitable i think. You fold everything here on this river other than flushes or combos which have the As (AA, AK)? |
|
| 1
|
Sliggy   Australia. Apr 29 2014 05:59. Posts 742 | | |
I'm not sure if I'm being results oriented or not, but 100% of the time I've been in this spot they've had the flush. Microstakes players don't typically exploit by calling flop multiway then calling turn then check/raising river to represent fake flushes to get people to fold sets.
I called twice earlier in the session in similar spots and lost buy-ins for it. Again, might be results oriented, but at the micros I don't see this being anything other than the nuts. |
|
|
| 1
|
fira   United States. Apr 29 2014 07:18. Posts 6345 | | |
played fine i think, though having the Qs makes me wanna call river a bit more |
|
| 1
|
napoleono   Romania. Apr 29 2014 09:25. Posts 771 | | |
| On April 29 2014 04:59 Sliggy wrote:
I'm not sure if I'm being results oriented or not, but 100% of the time I've been in this spot they've had the flush. Microstakes players don't typically exploit by calling flop multiway then calling turn then check/raising river to represent fake flushes to get people to fold sets.
I called twice earlier in the session in similar spots and lost buy-ins for it. Again, might be results oriented, but at the micros I don't see this being anything other than the nuts. |
Yea, might be. Im not even a cash player, but folding 2nd set seems super weak on a pretty dry board. Oh, and flop call wasnt multiway, it was already HU, cause the other guy folded. |
|
| 1
|
Sliggy   Australia. Apr 29 2014 09:44. Posts 742 | | |
When two players saw the flop and had the opportunity to call, I'm more likely to be facing draws, was what I meant to express. |
|
|
| 1
|
bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Apr 29 2014 11:03. Posts 8649 | | |
|
|
| |
|
All hands submitted by Sliggy: |
|
|
|
Poker Streams | |
|