PokerStars Zoom Hand #124034743564: Holdem No Limit ($0.02/$0.05) - 2014/10/27 20:50:05 PT [2014/10/27 23:50:05 ET]
Table Donati 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Dragev_R ($5.27 in chips)
Seat 2: Hero ($5.66 in chips)
Seat 3: juanca1009 ($4.68 in chips)
Seat 4: wQQds ($7.03 in chips)
Seat 5: juneblodie ($13.50 in chips)
Seat 6: Bonch241 ($5.19 in chips)
Hero: posts small blind $0.02
juanca1009: posts big blind $0.05
Holecards
Dealt to Hero
wQQds: folds
juneblodie: folds
Bonch241: folds
Dragev_R: folds
Hero: raises $0.10 to $0.15
juanca1009: calls $0.10
Flop (Pot : $0.30)
Hero: bets $0.20
juanca1009: calls $0.20
Turn (Pot : $0.70)
Hero: bets $0.40
juanca1009: calls $0.40
River (Pot : $1.50)
1
|
Trav94   Canada. Oct 28 2014 00:05. Posts 1789 | | |
Bet? I feel betting here is standard bvb? Villain is 24/19/0 over 44 hands. WTSD 1/4 times though.. small sample. Probably get called by an 8 and 99? |
|
|
1
|
TalentedTom   Canada. Oct 28 2014 00:25. Posts 20070 | | |
betting here is extremley nonstandard
your kinda shit out of luck, this is a terrible spot and a terrible river |
|
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
|
Trav94   Canada. Oct 28 2014 00:43. Posts 1789 | | |
idk, this is nl5. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if an 8 or 7 called bvb. I guess there's more hands that beat me then I beat though. |
|
|
1
|
BlizzY   Slovakia. Oct 28 2014 06:55. Posts 805 | | |
you argumented that people are more solid now on nl2 when you 3 barreled AKo on some dry 8 high board hoping to fold out overpairs and now you want to make a 3rd bet here with this hand for value calling it standard. Your logic is interesting. |
|
|
1
|
Trav94   Canada. Oct 28 2014 07:59. Posts 1789 | | |
Not so much arguing people at nl2 are solid, as much as that's just the way I'd think about the hand. Also had quite a few hands on that guy, and I think he was capable of making a fold with weaker overpairs in that hand. Sorry that wasn't so clear, and not sure why you're trying to start stuff? |
|
| Last edit: 28/10/2014 08:01 |
|
|
1
|
BlizzY   Slovakia. Oct 28 2014 08:09. Posts 805 | | |
I am not trying to start anything, just trying to put it in perspective. Your plays are sometimes very optimistic and it seemed to me the logic behind your play is contradicting as you try to justify bad plays, so was just trying to point it out as I remembered that hand. No offence meant. |
|
|
1
|
Trav94   Canada. Oct 28 2014 08:12. Posts 1789 | | |
Ah ok, just took that wrong then. I'd tend to agree that I do have an optimistic viewpoint on my plays sometimes. |
|
|
1
|
TalentedTom   Canada. Oct 28 2014 15:21. Posts 20070 | | |
| On October 28 2014 07:12 Trav94 wrote:
Ah ok, just took that wrong then. I'd tend to agree that I do have an optimistic viewpoint on my plays sometimes. |
this is very good, keep being optimistic, this is just one of those very rate shitty spots
dont stop value betting thin |
|
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
|
goose58   United States. Oct 28 2014 16:23. Posts 871 | | |
I'd bet the turn bigger simply because he's calling with a lot of hands we beat, c/f the river. Everything hit except for JT which we block, everything we beat will check most likely |
|
|
1
|
Trav94   Canada. Oct 28 2014 16:55. Posts 1789 | | |
| On October 28 2014 14:21 TalentedTom wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 28 2014 07:12 Trav94 wrote:
Ah ok, just took that wrong then. I'd tend to agree that I do have an optimistic viewpoint on my plays sometimes. |
this is very good, keep being optimistic, this is just one of those very rate shitty spots
dont stop value betting thin
|
Will do.. I just love to bet, and it works great. |
|
|
1
|
Santafairy   Korea (South). Oct 28 2014 17:00. Posts 2233 | | |
i was going to say check/shove |
|
It seems to be not very profitable in the long run to play those kind of hands. - Gus Hansen | |
|
|
1
|
bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Oct 28 2014 17:44. Posts 8649 | | |
| On October 28 2014 16:00 Santafairy wrote:
i was going to say check/shove |
wat |
|
|
|
1
|
Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Oct 28 2014 17:58. Posts 9634 | | |
I'd like to nit it up and say c/f, its not like we re getting exploited anyways |
|
|
1
|
Trav94   Canada. Oct 28 2014 18:28. Posts 1789 | | |
For what it's worth. I did bet river, villain called with 76o. Pretty sure that's a losing play vs most peoples betting range on this river. But I think it helps my theory that people play extra terrible bvb |
|
|
1
|
fira   United States. Oct 28 2014 19:33. Posts 6345 | | |
thoughts in regards to balance:
i kinda agree with c/f
it's not an extremely easy spot for villain to bet with their whole range, since we can have a check/raise range (i'd think that we're check/raising a lot of flushes here, can also check/raise some blocker hands like AhX)
we're pretty rarely if ever going to have no showdown value, other than the AhX hands so having a checking range works well. just have to be careful not to be only checking the weaker parts of our range |
|
|
|