PokerStars Zoom Hand #124238018144: Omaha Pot Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2014/10/31 13:28:38 ET
Table Aquarius Dwarf 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: menelaoss ($37.31 in chips)
Seat 2: neXOTa ($82.37 in chips)
Seat 3: LAMALOKAN ($89.30 in chips)
Seat 4: Croazil ($59.11 in chips)
Seat 5: Bejamin1 ($61.11 in chips)
Seat 6: jimakos1972 ($55.05 in chips)
neXOTa: posts small blind $0.25
LAMALOKAN: posts big blind $0.50
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Bejamin1 
Croazil: folds
Bejamin1: raises $1.25 to $1.75
jimakos1972: raises $4.25 to $6
menelaoss: folds
neXOTa: folds
LAMALOKAN: calls $5.50
Bejamin1: calls $4.25
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $18.25)
LAMALOKAN: checks
Bejamin1: checks
jimakos1972: bets $8.50
LAMALOKAN: folds
Bejamin1: raises $15.50 to $24
jimakos1972: calls $15.50
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $66.25)
Bejamin1: bets $31.11 and is all-in
jimakos1972: calls $25.05 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($6.06) returned to Bejamin1
River (Pot : $116.35)
Showdown
Bejamin1: shows (two pair, Sixes and Fives)
jimakos1972: shows 
(two pair, Nines and Sixes)
jimakos1972 collected $113.85 from pot
Summary
Total pot $116.35 | Rake $2.50
Board
Seat 1: menelaoss (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: neXOTa (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: LAMALOKAN (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 4: Croazil folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: Bejamin1 showed and lost with two pair, Sixes and Fives
Seat 6: jimakos1972 showed and won ($113.85) with two pair, Nines and Sixes
1
 |
Bejamin1 Canada. Oct 31 2014 13:31. Posts 7042 | | |
Yep. These are the clowns that are beating me. Well played. That makes total sense. Seriously. |
|
| Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
|
1
|
Bejamin1 Canada. Oct 31 2014 13:32. Posts 7042 | | |
Just have to cross my fingers that it will stop someday. |
|
| Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
|
1
 |
punix Germany. Oct 31 2014 13:41. Posts 406 | | |
can some1 fnally ban him? |
|
|
1
|
1
| |
In fact. fold 75% of the hands pre that you post. You will be at 600plo in no time. |
|
|
1
| |
why are you calling him a clown?
his play is reasonable considering your running these akward batshit bluffs
I always find it funny when someone runs a bluff and calls his opponent an idiot for calling light |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
| |
He called you in position hoping to improve / bluff you on the turn. This is a quote taken directly from you. You have done the exact same thing yourself. |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
| |
Not to mentioned you called a 3 bet OOP from MP and you are X/R on a 566 board...
you rep a very narrow range that has few 6s in and much fewer 55 combos.... its a easy call down |
|
|
1
|
Bullshit Canada. Oct 31 2014 18:27. Posts 738 | | |
to be fair your play is terrible |
|
|
1
|
Bejamin1 Canada. Oct 31 2014 19:11. Posts 7042 | | |
For those saying this is bad, the logic for this is simple:
1. It's a 3-way pot in a 3-bet pot.
2. Jimakos is 3-betting EP. He doesn't have a lot of low board coverage in his range here.
3. On a paired board 3-ways, math tells us most of the time one of us is very likely to have 3 of a kind.
4. The first guy who could have represented it chose not to and gave up vs. the c-bet.
5. That leaves me with a wonderful spot to check-raise. I do have low-board coverage in my range here.
6. He decides to call because he has a gutshot + 4 overs.
There is no way in hell his call is "good" at best it's "not good" but not entirely terrible.
I'm def balanced in this spot with bluffs making up max 25% of my range and really maybe it should be 50% because it works very frequently even if you choose to min-raise click-it-back.
On the turn he's only beating pure bluffs. Most of the time he's just value-towning himself. There is no way in hell that's "good" by any standard.
I would bluff in this spot again and I wouldn't think twice about it. I might however give up after the flop bluff doesn't work, because usually that means AAxx or KKxx that refuses to give up regardless of what comes town on turn/river. The sort of player who will always get stacked by trips but also win pots back when people are doing what I'm doing. And fair enough that's part of the game knowing who you can take this line against and who you can't. |
|
| Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
|
1
 |
K40Cheddar United States. Oct 31 2014 19:23. Posts 2202 | | |
| | On October 31 2014 17:27 Bullshit wrote:
to be fair your play is terrible |
|
| |
|
|
1
| |
| | On October 31 2014 17:27 Bullshit wrote:
to be fair your play is terrible |
|
|
| www.zoomwatcher.com Free statistics of the zoom games at PokerStars | |
|
|
1
| |
| | On October 31 2014 12:41 punix wrote:
can some1 fnally ban him? |
|
|
|
|
Contact Users: 925 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 03:28
Canada. Oct 31 2014 16:01. Posts 20070
