i think it depends wildly on villain how many 2pairs and sets he has here?

he's a fish

i dont think fish turn weak value hands into bluffs often enough for this to be a call

if its a fish -> u lost

fold, but I don't like under half pot bet on the turn, if villain is a fish he'll call closed to pot sized bets with Q's/10's, and draws then you could have gotten way more money in before the river.

On November 13 2014 12:23 LikeASet wrote: fold, but I don't like under half pot bet on the turn, if villain is a fish he'll call closed to pot sized bets with Q's/10's, and draws then you could have gotten way more money in before the river.

I don't min his turn sizing, but he should be making 3/4 at least on flop. Villains range should be pretty inelastic.

yap def bigger bet on flop, his range is huge there

yeah,fold river but bet more on flop if its a fish

On November 13 2014 12:39 GoTuNk wrote: Show nested quote + On November 13 2014 12:23 LikeASet wrote: fold, but I don't like under half pot bet on the turn, if villain is a fish he'll call closed to pot sized bets with Q's/10's, and draws then you could have gotten way more money in before the river. I don't min his turn sizing, but he should be making 3/4 at least on flop. Villains range should be pretty inelastic.

woops edit, meant bet sizing on flop in original post, if villain was a fish i would've something like 7.50

Meh, I see some weaker players spazzing here enough to consider a call especially with the odds we are getting, we only need to be good 30% of the time to make calling superior to folding.

considering we have close to no jack in our range I would be inclined to call, not to mention the fish spazz factor

Imo calling is certainly never a big mistake here, but typcially at low stakes,I dont think we are beating his range here 30% of the time...its probably 15- 20% at best.

The real mistake is the bet sizing on the flop.