PokerStars Zoom Hand #125480685562: Holdem No Limit ($0.05/$0.10) - 2014/11/20 23:57:46 WET [2014/11/20 18:57:46 ET]
Table Klinkenberg 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($19.42 in chips)
Seat 2: Rafa89cp ($9.90 in chips)
Seat 3: Edward731 ($10 in chips)
Seat 4: de lem ($16.05 in chips)
Seat 5: saulock ($21.08 in chips)
Seat 6: BloedSerieu$ ($22.51 in chips)
Rafa89cp: posts small blind $0.05
Edward731: posts big blind $0.10
Holecards
Dealt to Hero 
de lem: folds
saulock: folds
BloedSerieu$: calls $0.10
Hero: raises $0.35 to $0.45
Rafa89cp: calls $0.40
Edward731: folds
BloedSerieu$: calls $0.35
Flop (Pot : $1.45)
Rafa89cp: checks
BloedSerieu$: checks
Hero: bets $0.70
Rafa89cp: folds
BloedSerieu$: calls $0.70
Turn (Pot : $2.85)
BloedSerieu$: checks
Hero: bets $1.79
BloedSerieu$: calls $1.79
River (Pot : $6.43)
BloedSerieu$: bets $3.10
Hero:
1
 |
Corde United Kingdom. Nov 20 2014 19:01. Posts 1099 | | | |
|
|
1
|
1
 |
Trav94 Canada. Nov 20 2014 19:50. Posts 1789 | | |
jam that shit man... easiest jam ever. You could contemplate calling if you had like 23ss against some people, but even then... |
|
|
4
 |
Daut  United States. Nov 20 2014 20:14. Posts 8955 | | |
| | On November 20 2014 18:50 Trav94 wrote:
jam that shit man... easiest jam ever. You could contemplate calling if you had like 23ss against some people, but even then... |
23s is much closer to a fold than a raise. i wouldnt do either, just sayin.
this is pretty close when you block the 2nd/3rd nut flushes and youre 200bb deep. at these limits the best play is probably to raise to ~8 and fold to a shove. pretty exploitable, but whatever |
|
| NewbSaibot: 18 TIMES THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Because FUCK YOU, Daut | Last edit: 20/11/2014 20:19 |
|
|
1
| |
Not that I would expect this player to take this into account but the reason I wouldn't raise fold river here is because villain's most likely bluff hands are naked As hands and they should bet and then theoretically jam vs any raise with the nut blocker; causing hero to make a catastrophic fold which would be much worse than just calling or folding in the first place |
|
|
1
|
Corde United Kingdom. Nov 21 2014 07:45. Posts 1099 | | |
| | On November 20 2014 18:50 Trav94 wrote:
jam that shit man... easiest jam ever. You could contemplate calling if you had like 23ss against some people, but even then... |
yes, but we are 200bb deep. |
|
|
4
|
Daut United States. Nov 21 2014 11:44. Posts 8955 | | |
| | On November 21 2014 06:06 traxamillion wrote:
Not that I would expect this player to take this into account but the reason I wouldn't raise fold river here is because villain's most likely bluff hands are naked As hands and they should bet and then theoretically jam vs any raise with the nut blocker; causing hero to make a catastrophic fold which would be much worse than just calling or folding in the first place |
i dont think this type of player (limp/slowplay) will do that. if this were a live game vs a good hand reading tough player, i flat for the reasons you stated. |
|
| NewbSaibot: 18 TIMES THE SPEED OF LIGHT. Because FUCK YOU, Daut | |
|
|
1
 |
fira United States. Nov 21 2014 13:04. Posts 6345 | | |
agree w/ daut. raise-small/fold seems like a decent line, but hard to balance. we almost always have a medium flush when we do it, never a bluff, and sometimes nut flush but villain won't make a move unless he has nut blocker anyway
so yeah i'd go for raise-small/fold if we have a good read on villain, otherwise raise bigger with nuts/air |
|
|
|
Contact Users: 1100 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 15:18
