1
| |
I think this is fairly standard. Even if I don't have a flush blocker, this is still a call right? |
|
|
1
|
fira   United States. Feb 04 2015 02:51. Posts 6345 | | |
mm player dependent, it's prob close to 0 EV vs a random unknown
flush blocker doesn't matter too much imo, while it reduces his flush combos it also reduces his KsX bluffing combos |
|
|
1
|
traxamillion   United States. Feb 04 2015 09:06. Posts 10468 | | |
|
|
1
|
traxamillion   United States. Feb 04 2015 09:08. Posts 10468 | | |
Do you guys set up a play money game and then settle up the cash afterwards? |
|
|
1
| |
Why of course not, that would be illegal |
|
|
1
|
traxamillion   United States. Feb 04 2015 12:13. Posts 10468 | | |
oh of course, if it is against the ToS i wouldn't have even entertained the possibility!
Been a long time since i've played on stars and ive heard of people doing this for challenges and stuff so I just didn't know it was illegal. Makes sense for it to be illegal though. |
|
|
1
| |
I as surprised to hear your suggestion of 4-betting to 36 btw. I thought generally speaking, as betting continues preflop the sizing relative to the pot shrinks (and also the smaller the sizing should be if you are in position). Would you still suggest 4-betting to 36 if the stacksize was larger? Smaller?
|
|
|
1
|
traxamillion   United States. Feb 04 2015 14:18. Posts 10468 | | |
If stacks were smaller you would generally be ok with smaller sizing.
You don't have to go quite 36 but 3x 4bet is pretty normal. I feel like your sizing is almost like tourney 4bet sizing |
|
|
1
|
Trav94   Canada. Feb 04 2015 18:32. Posts 1789 | | |
| On February 04 2015 09:29 HungarianGOD wrote:
Why of course not |
lies |
|
|
|